The Expositor's Bible: The Acts of the Apostles, Vol. 2 — John Shaqi
The Expositor's Bible: The Acts of the Apostles, Vol. 2Stokes, George Thomas
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Acts of the Apostles, Vol. 2
Stokes, George Thomas
Bible. Acts -- Commentaries; Bible. Acts -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
[38] Conversion is scarcely a fit word to apply to the Lord's
dealings with Cornelius. He had evidently been converted long
before the angelic message and Peter's preaching, else whence his
prayers and devotion? The Lord simply made by St. Peter a fuller
revelation of His will to a soul longing to know more of God.
[39] We should carefully observe, however, that there is a marked
difference between the cases of Cornelius and Saul. An angel
appeared to Cornelius, Christ Himself to Saul. St. Peter is sent
to Cornelius to instruct him in the revelation made by Christ.
That revelation was made by Christ Himself to Saul in the vision
by the way, during the three days of his blindness, and probably
during his stay in Arabia. Ananias was sent to Saul merely to
baptize him, and predict his future. "Enter into the city and
there it shall be told thee what thou shalt _do_," is our Lord's
direction to Saul. St. Paul's knowledge of Christ was neither by
man nor through man. His knowledge even about the institution of
the sacraments was by immediate revelation: see 1 Cor. xi. 23.
Saul after the vision rose up from the earth and was led by the hand
into Damascus. He was there three days without sight, wherein he
neither did eat nor drink. This period of his life and this terrible
experience is regarded by many as the time to which may be traced the
weakness of eyesight and the delicate vision under which he ever
afterwards suffered. The question has often been raised, What was St.
Paul's thorn, or rather stake, in the flesh? Various opinions have
been hazarded, but that which seems to me most likely to be true
identifies the thorn or stake with severe ophthalmia. Six substantial
reasons are brought forward by Archdeacon Farrar in defence of this
view. (1) When writing to the Galatians St. Paul implies that his
infirmity might well have made him an object of loathing to them; and
this is specially the case with ophthalmia in the East (see Gal. iv.
14). (2) This supposition again gives a deeper meaning to the
Apostle's words to these same Galatians that they would at the
beginning of their Christian career have plucked out their eyes to
place them at his service (Gal. iv. 15). (3) The term "a stake in the
flesh" is quite appropriate to the disease, which imparts to the eyes
the appearance of having been wounded by a sharp splinter. (4)
Ophthalmia of that kind might have caused epilepsy. (5) It would
explain the words "See with how large letters I have written unto you
with mine own hand," as a natural reference to the difficulties the
Apostle experienced in writing, and would account for his constant use
of amanuenses or secretaries in writing his Epistles, as noted, for
instance, in Romans xvi. 22 and implied in 1 Corinthians xvi. 21. (6)
Ophthalmia would account for St. Paul's ignorance of the person of the
high priest (Acts xxiii. 5).[40] This question has, however, been a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account