The Expositor's Bible: The Book of DanielFarrar, F. W. (Frederic William)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Daniel
Farrar, F. W. (Frederic William)
Bible. Daniel -- Commentaries
[443] _Journal Asiatique_, 1886. (Comp. Nöldeke, _Ztschr.
für Assyriologie_, i. 414-418; Kamphausen, p. 46.) It is M.
Clermont-Ganneau who has the credit of discovering what seems to be the
true interpretation of these mysterious words. _M'nê_ (Heb. _Maneh_)
is the Greek μνᾶ, Lat. _mina_, which the Greeks borrowed from the
Assyrians. _Tekel_ (in the Targum of Onkelos _tîkla_) is the Hebrew
_shekel_. In the _Mishnah_ a half-mina is called _peras_, and an
Assyrian weight in the British Museum bears the inscription _perash_ in
the Aramaic character. (See Bevan, p. 106; Schrader, _s.v._ "Mene" in
Riehm, _R.W.B._) _Peres_ is used for a half-mina in _Yoma_, f. 4, 4;
often in the Talmud; and in _Corp. Inscr. Sem._, ii. 10 (Behrmann).
[444] The word occurs in _Perez_ Uzza. There still, however, remain
some obviously unexplored mysteries about these words. Paronomasia,
as I showed long ago in other works, plays a noble and profound part
in the language of emotion; and that the interpretation should here
be made to turn upon it is not surprising by any means. We find it
in the older prophets. Thus in Jer. i. 11, 12: "What seest thou? And
I said, I see a rod of _an almond tree_. Then said the Lord unto me,
Thou hast well seen: for I will _hasten_ My word to perform it." The
meaning here depends on the resemblance in Hebrew between _shaqeed_,
"an almond tree" ("a wakeful, or early tree"), and _shoqeed_, "I will
hasten," or "am wakeful over."
And that the same use of plays on words was still common in the
Maccabean epoch we see in the Story of Susanna. There Daniel plays
on the resemblance between σχῖνος, "a mastick tree," and σχίσει,
"shall cut thee in two"; and πρῖνος, "a holm oak," and πρίσαι, "to
cut asunder." We may also point to the fine paronomasia in the Hebrew
of Isa. v. 7, Mic. i. 10-15, and other passages. "Such a conceit,"
says Mr. Ball, "may seem to us far-fetched and inappropriate; but the
Oriental mind delights in such _lusus verborum_, and the peculiar
force of all such passages in the Hebrew prophets is lost in our
version because they have not been preserved in translation."
As regards the Medes, they are placed _after_ the Persians in Isa.
xxi. 2, Esther i. 3, but generally _before_ them.
[445] LXX., ἔδωκεν ἐξουσίαν αὐτῳ τοῦ τρίτου μέρους; Theodot., ἄρχοντα
τρίτον. See _supra_, p. 210.
[446] The LXX. evidently felt some difficulty or followed some other
text, for they render it, "And _Artaxerxes of the Medes_ took the
kingdom, and Darius full of _days and glorious in old age_." So, too,
Josephus (_Antt._, X. xi. 4), who says that "he was called by another
name among the Greeks."
[447] _Cyrop._, I. v. 2.
[448] _Antt._, X. xi. 4. This was the view of Vitringa, Bertholdt,
Gesenius, Winer, Keil, Hengstenberg, Hävernick, etc.
[449] _Ad. Q. Fratr._, i. 8.
[450] The view of Niebuhr and Westcott.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account