The Expositor's Bible: The Book of DanielFarrar, F. W. (Frederic William)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Daniel
Farrar, F. W. (Frederic William)
Bible. Daniel -- Commentaries
[575] Comp. ὀργὴ μεγάλη (1 Macc. i. 64; Isa. x. 5, 25, xxvi. 20; Jer.
l. 5; Rom. ii. 5, etc.).
[576] Comp. xi. 21.
[577] Comp. ii. 34, xi. 45. Antiochus died of a long and terrible
illness in Persia. Polybius (xxxi. 11) describes his sickness by the
word δαιμονήσας. Arrian (_Syriaca_, 66) says φθίνων ἐτελεύτησε. In
1 Macc. vi. 8-16 he dies confessing his sins against the Jews, but
there is another story in 2 Macc. ix. 4-28.
[578] Ver. 27, "I was gone" (or, "came to an end") "whole days."
With this ἔκστασις comp. ii. 1, vii. 28; Exod. xxxiii. 20; Isa. vi.
5; Luke ix. 32; Acts ix. 4, etc. Comp. xii. 8; Jer. xxxii. 14, and
(_contra_) Rev. xxii. 10.
[579] In ver. 26 the R.V. renders "it belongeth to many days _to come_."
[580] Comp. Gen. i. 5; 2 Cor. xi. 25. The word _tamîd_ includes both
the morning and evening sacrifice (Exod. xxix. 41). Pusey says (p.
220), "The shift of halving the days is one of those monsters which
have disgraced scientific expositions 'of Hebrew.'" Yet this is the
view of such scholars as Ewald, Hitzig, Kuenen, Cornill, Behrmann.
The latter quotes a parallel: "vgl. im Hildebrandsliede _sumaro ente
wintro_ sehstie = 30 Jahr."
[581] Matt. xxiv. 22.
[582] "These five passages agree in making the final distress last
during three years and a fraction: the only difference lies in the
magnitude of the fraction" (Bevan, p. 127).
[583] 1 Macc. iv. 41-56; 2 Macc. x. 1-5.
[584] See on this period Diod. Sic., _Fr._, xxvi. 79; Liv., xlii. 29;
Polyb., _Legat._, 71; Justin, xxxiv. 2; Jer., _Comm. in Dan._, xi. 22;
Jahn, _Hebr. Commonwealth_, § xciv.; Prideaux, _Connection_, ii. 146.
[585] _Connection_, ii. 188.
[586] _Gesch. d. V. Isr._, i. 155.
[587] Some of these dates are _uncertain_, and are variously given by
different authorities.
CHAPTER III
_THE SEVENTY WEEKS_
This chapter is occupied with the prayer of Daniel, and with the
famous vision of the seventy weeks which has led to such interminable
controversies, but of which the interpretation no longer admits of
any certainty, because accurate data are not forthcoming.
The vision is dated in the first year of Darius, the son of
Achashverosh, of the Median stock.[588] We have seen already that
such a person is unknown to history. The date, however, accords
well in this instance with the literary standpoint of the writer.
The vision is sent as a consolation of perplexities suggested by
the writer's study of the Scriptures; and nothing is more naturally
imagined than the fact that the overthrow of the Babylonian Empire
should have sent a Jewish exile to the study of the rolls of his holy
prophets, to see what light they threw on the exile of his people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account