The Expositor's Bible: The Book of DanielFarrar, F. W. (Frederic William)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Daniel
Farrar, F. W. (Frederic William)
Bible. Daniel -- Commentaries
[234] Athen., _Deipnos_, xi. 583. See Bevan, p. 60; Max Müller in
Pusey, p. 565. How Professor Fuller can urge the presence of these
Persian words in proof of the genuineness of Daniel (_Speaker's
Commentary_, p. 250) I cannot understand. For Daniel does not seem
to have survived beyond the third year of the Persian dominion, and
it is extremely difficult to suppose that all these Persian words,
including titles of Nebuchadrezzar's officials, were already current
among the Babylonians. On the other hand, _Babylonian_ words seem to
be rare, though Daniel is represented as living nearly the whole of
a long life in Babylon. There is no validity in the argument that
these words could not have been known in the days of the Maccabees,
"for half of them are common in Syria, though the oldest extant
Syriac writers are _later by three centuries_ than the time of the
Maccabees" (Bevan, p. 41).
[235] The name Daniel occurs among Ezra's contemporaries in Ezra
viii. 2; Neh. x. 7, and the other names in Neh. viii. 4, x. 3, 24; 1
Esdras ix. 44.
[236] _Balatsu-utsur._ The name in this form had nothing to do with
Bel, as the writer of Daniel seems to have supposed (Dan. iv. 5), nor
yet with Beltis, the wife of Bel. See _supra_, p. 47. Comp. the names
Nabusarutsur, Sinsarutsur, Assursarutsur. Also comp. _Inscr. Semit._,
ii. 38, etc. Pseudo-Epiphanius says that Nebuchadrezzar meant Daniel
to be co-heir with his son Belshazzar.
[237] F. Delitzsch calls Meshach _vox hybrida_. Neither "Shadrach"
nor "Meshach" occurs on the monuments. "That the imposition of names
is a symbol of mastership over slaves is plain" (S. Chrys., _Opp._,
iii. 21; Pusey, p. 16). Comp. 2 Kings xxiii. 34 (Egyptians); xxiv. 17
(Babylonians); Ezra v. 14, Esther ii. 7 (Persians).
[238] Comp. Obadiah, Abdiel, Abdallah, etc. Schrader says, p. 429: "The
supposition that Nebo was altered to Nego, out of a contumelious desire
(which Jews often displayed) to alter, avoid, and insult the names of
idols, is out of place, since the other names are not altered."
[239] Jos., _Antt._, XII. v. 1; Derenbourg, _Palestine_, p. 34;
Ewald, _Hist._, v. 294 (E. Tr.); Munk, _Palestine_, p. 495, etc.
[240] See Ewald, _Gesch. Isr._, vi. 654. "They shall eat unclean
things in Assyria" (Hosea ix. 3). "The children of Israel shall eat
their defiled bread among the Gentiles" (Ezek. iv. 13, 14).
[241] 1 Macc. i. 62, 63.
[242] 2 Macc. vi. 18-31. Comp. the LXX. addition to Esther iv. 14, v.
4, where she is made to plead before God that she had not tasted of
the table of Haman or of the king's banquet. So Judith takes "clean"
bread with her into the camp of Holofernes (Judith x. 5), and Judas
and his followers live on herbs in the desert (2 Macc. v. 27). The
_Mishnah_ even forbids to take the bread, oil, or milk of the heathen.
[243] _Prophets of the O. T._, p. 184 (E. Tr.).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account