The Expositor's Bible: The Book of ExodusChadwick, G. A. (George Alexander)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Exodus
Chadwick, G. A. (George Alexander)
Bible. Exodus -- Commentaries
To oppose all such tendencies, the Lord appealed not to philosophy and
sound reason. These are not the parents of monotheism: they are the
fruit of it. And so is our modern science. Its fundamental principle is
faith in the unity of nature, and in the extent to which the same laws
which govern our little world reach through the vast universe. And that
faith is directly traceable to the conviction that all the universe is
the work of the same Hand.
“One God, one law, one element;”—the preaching of the first was sure to
suggest the other two. Nor could any race which believed in a multitude
of gods labour earnestly to reduce various phenomena to one cause.
Monotheism is therefore the parent of correct thinking, and could not
draw its sanctions thence. No: the law appeals to the historical
experience of Israel; it is content to stand and fall by that; if they
acknowledged the claim of God upon their loyalty, all the rest followed.
Their own story made good this claim. And so does the whole story of the
Church, and the whole inner life of every man who knows anything of
himself, bear witness to the religion of Jesus.
Never let us weary of repeating that while we have ample controversial
resource, while no missile can pierce the chain-armour of the Christian
evidences, connected and interwoven into a great whole, and while the
infidelity which is called scientific is really infidel only so far as
it begs its case (which is an unscientific thing to do), nevertheless
the strength of our position is experimental. If the experience which
testifies to Jesus were historical alone, I might refuse to give it
credit: if it were only personal, I might ascribe it to enthusiasm. But
as long as a great cloud of living witnesses, and all the history of the
Church, declare the reality of His salvation, while I myself feel the
sufficiency of what He offers (or else the bitter need of it), so long
the question is not between conflicting theories, but between theories
and facts. To have another god is to place him beside One Whom we
already have, and Who has wrought for us the great emancipation. It is
not an error in theological science: it is ingratitude and treason.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account