The Expositor's Bible: The Book of NumbersWatson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Numbers
Watson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Bible. Numbers -- Commentaries
It has been questioned whether the number of the first-born, which
is 22,273, can in any way be made to agree with the total number
of the male Israelites, previously stated at 603,550. Wellhausen
is specially contemptuous of a tradition or calculation which, he
says, would give an average of forty children to each woman. But
the difficulty partly yields if it is kept in view that the Levites
were separated for the service of the sanctuary. Naturally it would
be the heir-apparent alone of each family group whose liability to
this kind of duty fell to be considered. The head of a household was,
according to the ancient reckoning, its priest. In Abraham's family
no one counted as a first-born but Isaac. Now that a generation of
Israelites is growing up sanctified by the covenant, it appears fit
that the presumptive priest should either be devoted to sacerdotal
duty, or relieved of it by a Levite as his substitute. Suppose each
family had five tents, and suppose further that the children born
before the exodus are not reckoned, the number will not be found at
all disproportionate. The absolute number remains a difficulty.
Dr. Robertson Smith argues from his own premises about the sanctity
of the first-born. He repudiates the notion that at one time the
Hebrews actually sacrificed all their first-born sons; yet he affirms
that "there must have been some point of attachment in ancient custom
for the belief that the Deity asked for such a sacrifice."[1] "I
apprehend," he proceeds, "that all the prerogatives of the first-born
among Semitic peoples are originally prerogatives of sanctity; the
sacred blood of the kin flows purest and strongest in him (Gen. xlix.
3). Neither in the case of children nor in that of cattle did the
congenital holiness of the first-born originally imply that they must
be sacrificed or given to the Deity on the altar, but only that if
sacrifice was to be made, they were the best and fittest because the
holiest victims." The passage in Numbers may be confidently declared
to be far from any such conception. The special fitness for sacrifice
of the first-born of an animal is assumed: the fitness of the heir
of a family, again, is plainly not to _become_ a sacrifice, but to
offer sacrifice. The first-born of the Egyptians died. But it is
the life, the holy activity of His own people, not their death, God
desires. And this holy activity, rising to its highest function in
the first-born, is according to our passage laid on the Levites to a
certain extent. Not entirely indeed. The whole congregation is still
consecrated and must be holy. All are bound by the covenant. The head
of each family group will still have to officiate as a priest in
celebrating the passover. Certain duties, however, are transferred
for the better protection of the sanctities of worship.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account