The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Numbers — John Shaqi
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of NumbersWatson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Numbers
Watson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Bible. Numbers -- Commentaries
But everything used in His worship must be kept
apart. The worship must be of faith; and the ark which was the great
symbol must remain always invisible. The effect of this on the
popular mind was complex, varying with the changing circumstances of
the nation; and to trace it would be an interesting piece of study.
It may be remembered that in the time of most ardent Judaism the want
of the ark made no difference to the veneration in which the temple
was held and the intense devotion of the people to their religion.
The ark was used as a talisman in Eli's time; in the temple erected
after the captivity there was no ark; its place in the holy of holies
was occupied by a stone.
The Gershonites had as their charge the screens and curtains of the
tabernacle, or most holy place, and the tent of meeting or holy
place, also the curtains of the court of the tabernacle. The boards,
bars, pillars, and sockets of the tabernacle and of the court were to
be entrusted to the Merarites.
In the whole careful ordering of the duties to be discharged by
these Levites we see a figure of the service to be rendered to God
and men in one aspect of it. Organisation, attention to details,
and subordination of those who carry out schemes to the appointed
officials, and of all, both inferior and superior, to law--these
ideas are here fully represented. Assuming the incapacity of many for
spontaneous effort, the principle that God is not a God of confusion
but of order in the churches of the saints may be held to point to
subordination of a similar kind even under Christianity. But the idea
carried to its full limit, implies an inequality between men which
the free spirit of Christianity will not admit. It is an honour for
men to be connected with any spiritual enterprise, even as bearers of
burdens. Those who take such a place may be spiritual men, thoughtful
men, as intelligent and earnest as their official superiors. But the
Levites, according to the law, were to be bearers of burdens, menials
of the sanctuary from generation to generation. Here the parallel
absolutely fails. No Christian, however cordially he may fill such a
place for a time, is bound to it in perpetuity. His way is open to
the highest duties and honours of a redeemed son of God. In a sense
Judaism even did not prevent the spiritual advancement of any Levite,
or any man. The priesthood was practically closed, but the office of
the prophet, really higher than that of the priest, was not. From the
routine work of the priesthood men like Jeremiah and Ezekiel were
called by the Spirit of God to speak in the name of the Highest.
The word of the Lord was put into their mouths. Elijah, who was
apparently of the tribe of Manasseh, Amos and Daniel, who belonged to
Judah, became prophets. The open door for the men of the tribes was
into this calling. Neither in Israel nor in Christendom is priesthood
the highest religious function. The great servants of God might well
refuse it or throw aside its shackles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account