The Expositor's Bible: The Book of NumbersWatson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Numbers
Watson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Bible. Numbers -- Commentaries
Regarding the Passover in the wilderness, difficulties have been
raised on the ground that a sufficient number of lambs, males of
the first year, could scarcely have been provided, and that the
sacrificing of the lambs by Aaron and his two sons within the
prescribed time would have been impossible. The second point of
difficulty disappears if this Passover was, as we have seen reason
to believe, a family festival like that observed on the occasion
of the exodus. Again, the number of yearling male lambs required
would depend on the number who partook of the feast. Calculations
made on the basis that one lamb sufficed for about fifteen, and that
men alone ate the Passover, leave the matter in apparent doubt.
Some fifty thousand lambs would still be needed. Keeping by the
enumeration of the Israelites given in the muster-roll of Numbers,
some writers explain that the desert tribes might supply large
numbers of lambs, and that kids also were available. The difficulty,
however, remains, and it is one of those which point to the
conclusion that the numbers given have somehow been increased in the
transcription of the ancient records century after century.
The case of certain men who could not partake of the Passover in
the first month, because they were unclean through the dead, was
brought before Moses and Aaron. The men felt it to be a great loss
of privilege, especially as the march was about to begin, and they
might not have another opportunity of observing the feast. Who indeed
could tell whether in the first conflict it might not be his lot
to fall by the sword? "We are unclean by the _nephesh_ of a man,"
they said: "wherefore are we kept back, that we may not offer the
oblation of the Lord in its appointed season among the children of
Israel?" The result of the appeal was the new law providing that two
disabilities, and two only, should be acknowledged. The supplementary
Passover of the second month was appointed for those unclean by the
dead, and those on a journey who found themselves too far off to
reach in time the precincts of the sanctuary. Those unclean would be
in a month presumably free from defilement; those on a journey would
probably have returned. The concession is a note of the gracious
reasonableness that in many ways distinguished the Hebrew religion;
and the Passover observances of Jews at the present day are based on
the conviction that what is practicable is accepted by God, though
statute and form cannot be kept.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account