The Expositor's Bible: The Book of NumbersWatson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Numbers
Watson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Bible. Numbers -- Commentaries
But while in a sense there is restriction of the spiritual influence,
in another sense there is no restraint. The Divine afflatus is not
confined to those who have gathered at the tabernacle. It is not
place or occasion that makes the prophets; it is the Spirit, the
power from on high entering into life; and out in the camp the two
have their portion of the new energy and zeal. Spiritual influence,
then, is not confined to any particular place. Neither was the
neighbourhood of the tabernacle so holy that there alone the elders
could receive their gift; nor is any place of meeting, any church,
capable of such consecration and singular identification with the
service of God that there alone the power of the Divine Spirit can be
manifested or received. Let there be a man chosen of God, ready for
the duties of a holy calling, and on that man the Spirit will come,
wherever he is, in whatever he is engaged. He may be employed in
common work, but in doing it he will be moved to earnest service and
testimony. He may be labouring, under great difficulties, to restore
the justice that has been impaired by social errors and political
chicanery--and his words will be prophetic; he will be a witness for
God to those who are without faith, without holy fear.
While Eldad and Medad prophesied in the camp, a young man who
heard them ran officiously to inform Moses. To this young man as
to others--for no doubt there were many who loved and revered the
Usual--the two elders were presumptuous fools. The camp was, as we
say, secular: was it not? People in the camp looked after ordinary
affairs, tended their cattle, chaffered and bargained, quarrelled
about trifles, murmured against Moses and against God. Was it right
to prophesy there, carrying religious words and ideas into the midst
of common life? If Eldad and Medad could prophesy, let them go to the
tabernacle. And besides, what right had they to speak for Jehovah, in
Jehovah's name? Was not Moses the prophet, the only prophet? Israel
was accustomed to think him so, would keep to that opinion. It would
be confusing if at any one's tent door a prophet might begin to
speak without warning. So the young man thought it his duty to run
and tell Moses what was taking place. And Joshua, when he heard, was
alarmed, and desired Moses to put an end to the irregular ministry.
"My lord Moses, forbid them," he said. He was jealous not for himself
and the other elders, but for Moses' sake. So far the leader alone
held communication with Jehovah and spoke in His name; and there was
perhaps some reason for the alarm of Joshua, more than was apparent
at the time. To have one central authority was better and safer than
to have many persons using the right to speak in any sense for God.
Who could be sure that these new voices would agree with Moses in
every respect? Even if they did, might there not be divisions in the
camp, new priesthoods as well as new oracles? Prophets might not be
always wise, always truly inspired.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account