The Expositor's Bible: The First Epistle to the CorinthiansDods, Marcus
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The First Epistle to the Corinthians
Dods, Marcus
Bible. Corinthians, 1st -- Commentaries
2. Paul maintains his right to support on the principle of
remuneration everywhere observed in human affairs. The soldier does
not go to war at his own expense, but expects to be equipped and
maintained in efficiency by those for whom he fights. The vinedresser,
the shepherd, every labourer, expects, and is certainly warranted in
expecting, that the toil he expends will at least have the result of
keeping him comfortably in life. However difficult it is to lay down
an absolute law of wages, this may at least be affirmed as a natural
principle: that labour of all kinds must be so paid as to maintain the
labourer in life and efficiency; and it may be added that there are
certain inalienable human rights, such as the right to bring up a
family the members of which shall be useful and not burdensome to
society, the right to some reserve of leisure and of strength which
the labourer may use for his own enjoyment and advantage, which rights
will be admitted and provided for when out of the confused war of
theories, and strikes, and competition a just law of wages has been
won. Happily no one now needs to be told that one of the most striking
results of our modern civilisation is that the nineteenth century
labourer has less of the joy of life than the ancient slave, and that
we have forgotten the fundamental law that the husbandman that
laboureth must be first partaker of the fruits.
And lest any one should sanctimoniously or ignorantly say, "These
secular principles have no application to sacred things," Paul
anticipates the objection, and dismisses it: "Say I these things as a
man? or saith not the Law the same also?" I am not introducing into a
sacred region principles which rule only in secular matters. Does not
the Law say, "Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the
corn"? It must be allowed to live by its labour. As it threshes out
the wheat, it must be allowed to feed itself, mouthful by mouthful,
as it goes on with its work. And this was not said in the Law because
God had any special care for oxen, but in order to give expression to
the law which must regulate the connection between all labourers and
their work that he that plougheth may plough in hope, may have a
personal interest in his work, and may give himself ungrudgingly to
it, assured that he himself will be the first to benefit by it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account