The Expositor's Bible: The First Epistle to the CorinthiansDods, Marcus
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The First Epistle to the Corinthians
Dods, Marcus
Bible. Corinthians, 1st -- Commentaries
Paul then had certain rights which he was resolved should be
acknowledged, although he waived them. He maintains that if he saw
fit, he might require the Church to maintain him, and to maintain him
not merely in the bare way in which he was content to live, but to
furnish him with the ordinary comforts of life. He might, for example,
he says, require the Church to enable him to keep a wife and to pay
not only his own, but her, travelling expenses. The other Apostles
apparently took their wives with them on their apostolic journeys, and
may have found them useful in gaining access for the Gospel to the
secluded women of Eastern and Greek cities. He might also, he says,
"forbear working;" might cease, that is to say, from his tent-making
and look to his converts for support. He is indignant at the sordid,
or malicious, or mistaken spirit which could deny him such support.
This claim to support and privilege Paul rests on several grounds. 1.
He is an apostle, and the other Apostles enjoyed these privileges.
"Have we not power to take with us a Christian woman as a wife, as
well as other Apostles?... Or I only and Barnabas, have not we power
to forbear working?" His proof of his apostleship is summary: "Have I
not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? are not ye my work in the Lord?" No
one could be an apostle who had not seen Jesus Christ after His
resurrection. The Apostles were to be witnesses to the Resurrection,
and were qualified to be so by seeing the Lord alive after death. But
it seems to have been commonly urged against Paul that he had not been
among those to whom Christ showed Himself after He rose from the dead.
Paul therefore both in his reported speeches and in his letters
insists upon the fact that on the way to Damascus he had seen the
risen Lord.
But not every one who had seen the Lord after His resurrection was an
apostle, but those only who by Him were commissioned to witness to it;
and that Paul had been thus commissioned he thinks the Corinthians may
conclude from the results among themselves of his preaching. The
Church at Corinth was the seal of his apostleship. What was the use of
quibbling about the time and manner of his ordination, when the
reality and success of his apostolic work were so apparent? The Lord
had acknowledged his work. In presence of the finished structure that
draws the world to gaze, it is too late to ask if he who built it is
an architect. Would that every minister could so prove the validity of
his orders!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account