The Expositor's Bible: The First Epistle to the CorinthiansDods, Marcus
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The First Epistle to the Corinthians
Dods, Marcus
Bible. Corinthians, 1st -- Commentaries
A difficulty, however, meets us at the outset. We have no opportunity
of observing these gifts in exercise, and cannot readily understand
them. With prophecy indeed there need be no great difficulty.
Prophesying is speaking for God, whether the utterance regards present
or future matters. When Moses complained that he had no gift of
utterance, God said, "Aaron shall be thy prophet;" that is, shall
speak for thee, or be thy spokesman. Prediction is not necessarily any
part of the prophet's function. It may be so, and often it was so, but
a man might be a prophet who had no revelation of the future. In the
sense in which Paul uses the word, a prophet was "an inspired teacher
and exhorter who revealed to men the secrets of God's will and word
and the secrets of their own hearts for the purpose of conversion and
edification." The function of the prophet is indicated in the third
verse: "He that prophesieth speaketh for edification, and
exhortation, and comfort;" and still further in the twenty-fourth and
twenty-fifth verses, where the results of prophesying are described in
terms precisely such as we should use to describe the results of
efficacious preaching. The hearer is "convinced," is conscious in
himself that the words spoken are shedding light and carrying
conviction into the recesses of his heart. The gift of prophecy, then,
was the endowment which enabled a Christian to speak so as to bring
the mind and spirit of the hearer into touch with God.
But the gift of tongues is involved in greater obscurity. On its first
occurrence, as recorded in the book of Acts, it would seem to have
been the gift of speaking in foreign languages. We are told that the
strangers from Asia Minor, Parthia, the shores of the Black Sea,
Africa, and Italy, when they heard the disciples speaking, recognised
that they were speaking intelligible languages. One man was attracted
by the sound of his native Arabic; another heard the familiar Latin; a
third for the first time in Jerusalem heard a Jew speaking the
language he was accustomed to hear on the banks of the Nile. Naturally
they were confounded by the circumstance, "every man hearing," as it
is said, "his own language, the tongue wherein he was born." It would
certainly seem probable, therefore, that, whether the gift afterwards
changed its character or not, it was originally the power of speaking
in a foreign language so as to be intelligible to any one who
understood that language.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account