The Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of St. John, Vol. IDods, Marcus
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of St. John, Vol. I
Dods, Marcus
Bible. John; Bible. John -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
In the paragraph we are considering a very needful reminder is given us
that the Jews of our Lord’s time used the terms “God” and “Son of God”
in a loose and inexact manner. Where the sense was not likely to be
misunderstood, they did not scruple to apply these terms to officials
and dignitaries. The angels they called sons of God; their own judges
they called by the same name. The whole people considered collectively
was called “God’s son.” And in the 2nd Psalm, speaking of the Messianic
King, God says, “Thou art My Son: this day have I begotten Thee.” It was
therefore natural that the Jews should think of the Messiah not as
properly Divine, but merely as being of such surpassing dignity as to be
worthily though loosely called “Son of God.” No doubt there are passages
in the Old Testament which intimate with sufficient clearness that the
Messiah would be truly Divine: “Thy throne, O God, is for ever and
ever;” “Unto us a Child is born ... and His name shall be called the
Mighty God;” “Behold the days come that I will raise unto David a
righteous Branch, and this is the name whereby He shall be called,
Jehovah our Righteousness.” But though these passages seem decisive to
us, looking on the fulfilment of them in Christ, we must consider that
the Jewish Bible did not lie on every table for consultation as our
Bibles do, and also that it was easy for the Jews to put a figurative
sense on all such passages.
In a word, it was a Messiah the Jews looked for, not the Son of God.
They looked for one with Divine powers, the delegate of God, sent to
accomplish His will and to establish His kingdom, the representative
among them of the Divine presence; but they did not look for a real
dwelling of a Divine Person among them. It is quite certain that the
Jews of the second century thought it silly of the Christians to hold
that the Christ pre-existed from eternity as God, and condescended to be
born as man. “No Jew would allow,” says a writer of that time, “that any
prophet ever said that a Son of God would come; but what the Jews do say
is that the Christ of God will come.”
This circumstance, that the Jews did not expect the Messiah to be a
Divine Person, throws light upon certain passages in the Gospels. When,
for example, our Lord put the question, “What think ye of Christ? Whose
Son is He?” The Pharisees promptly answer, “He is the Son of David.”
And, that they had no thought of ascribing to the Messiah a properly
Divine origin, is shown by their inability to answer the further
question, “How then does David call Him Lord?”—a question presenting no
difficulty at all to any one who believed that the Messiah was to be
Divine as well as human.[37]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account