The Expositor's Bible: The Second Book of SamuelBlaikie, William Garden
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Second Book of Samuel
Blaikie, William Garden
Bible. Samuel, 2nd -- Commentaries
In the commencement of the war, the first step was taken by Abner.
He went out from Mahanaim, descended the Jordan valley, and came to
Gibeon, in the tribe of Benjamin, a place but a few miles distant from
Gibeah, where Saul had reigned. His immediate object probably was to
gain such an advantage over David in that quarter as would enable
him to establish Ishbosheth at Gibeah, and thus bring to him all the
prestige due to the son and successor of Saul. We must not forget that
the Philistines had still great influence in the land, and very likely
they were in possession of Gibeah, after having rifled Saul's palace
and appropriated all his private property. With this powerful enemy
to be dealt with ultimately, it was the interest of Abner to avoid a
collision of the whole forces on either side, and spare the slaughter
which such a contest would have involved. There is some obscurity in
the narrative now before us, both at this point and at other places.
But it would appear that, when the two armies were ranged on opposite
sides of the "pool" or reservoir at Gibeon, Abner made the proposal
to Joab that the contest should be decided by a limited number of
young men on either side, whose encounter would form a sort of play or
spectacle, that their brethren might look on, and, in a sense, enjoy.
In the circumstances, it was a wise and humane proposal, although we
get something of a shock from the frivolous spirit that could speak of
such a deadly encounter as "play."
David was not present with his troops on this occasion, the management
of them being entrusted to Joab, his sister's son. Here was another
of the difficulties of David--a difficulty which embarrassed him for
forty years. He was led to commit the management of his army to his
warlike nephew, although he appears to have been a man very unlike
himself. Joab is much more of the type of Saul than of David. He is
rough, impetuous, worldly, manifesting no faith, no prayerfulness,
no habit or spirit of communion with God. Yet from the beginning
he threw in his lot with David; he remained faithful to him in the
insurrection of Absalom; and sometimes he gave him advice which was
more worthy to be followed than his own devices. But though Joab was
a difficulty to David, he did not master him. The course of David's
life and the character of his reign were determined mainly by those
spiritual feelings with which Joab appears to have had no sympathy. It
was unfortunate that the first stage of the war should have been in the
hands of Joab; he conducted it in a way that must have been painful to
David; he stained it with a crime that gave him bitter pain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account