The express companies of the United States : $b a study of a public utilityBenedict, Bertram
History
The express companies of the United States : $b a study of a public utility
Benedict, Bertram
Express service -- United States; Parcel post -- United States
NOTE 4--The example of the United Kingdom substantiates the last
surmise. For in the United Kingdom the railroads, all privately owned,
are given 55% of the total charges on all _parcel-post parcels_ carried
by them, irrespective of distance. (And there is evidence that this
remuneration is expressly considered too generous in the United
Kingdom.) Now, the parcel-post charges in the United Kingdom are
considerably lower than the express charges in the United States not
only absolutely, but also relatively to the different values of money in
the two countries. But the railroads' service in carrying a parcel-post
package, aside from furnishing mail cars, is no more expensive than
their service of carrying an express package of the same weight. If the
railroads of the United States were to carry parcels at 55% of the
_parcel-post charges_ or at that percentage of the parcel-post charges
in this country which, considering the difference of conditions in the
two countries, would correspond to 55% of the parcel-post charges in the
United States, they obviously would be receiving much less than 50% of
the _total express charges_. Nor should the fact that express packages
on the whole may travel farther and weigh more than parcel-post packages
invalidate the argument, for the present contracts with the railroads
have not been altered to any extent so as to meet any such condition due
to the advent of the parcel-post--in the year before the parcel-post was
established the railroads got 49% of the net express charges and in
1917, 51%. So that the question as to whether the railroads of the
United States obtain on the whole too high a proportion of the express
rates because of unduly high percentage clauses in the express
company-railroad company contracts is, if not thus answered, at least
illumined.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ADAMS EXPRESS COMPANY, et al--Response in Interstate Commerce
Commission Docket No. 4198, opposing decrease in express rates
(1911).
CENSUS BUREAU--
Census of 1890: Transportation in the United States.
Census of 1890, Bulletin: Transportation Business in the United
States (Part II), Transportation by Express Companies (1894).
Express business in the United States (1907).
CHANDLER, WILLIAM H.--The Express Service and Rates (1914).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, 1911 AND 1912--Speeches, bills, etc., concerning
the parcel-post and express service.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE--
Annual Reports, Secretary of Agriculture, 1917 and 1918.
Farmers' Bulletins Nos. 594, 688, 703, 922, 930 and others
relating to marketing by parcel-post.
FIELD, ARTHUR S.--Rates and Practises of Express Companies; and The
Express Charges Prescribed by the Interstate Commerce Commission,
American Economic Review, 1913, volume 3, pages 314 and 831.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION--
Annual Reports, Statistics of Express Companies, 1909-1918.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account