[Illustration: FIG. 18--Map of the same area shown in Fig. 17 enlarged
from the corresponding sections of the 1:62,500 Columbus and Seale,
Ga.-Ala., and the 1:125,000 Talbotton and Opelika, Ga.-Ala., topographic
sheets surveyed mainly in 1906 and 1907 and published by the U.S.
Geological Survey. The cross section at the bottom lies along the line
indicated on the map and extends somewhat beyond the right border of the
map. The section shows the broad shelf upon which the city rests and its
relation to the river and to the terraced hillsides east of it. Scale,
1:38,000.]
CHAPTER VI
MARSHES AND MARSH DRAINAGE
(FIGS. 19 TO 27)
Mention has been made of the objects seen better from the air than from
any viewpoint on the ground; but there are some objects which as a whole
can be seen only from above. Swamps, parts of everglades, peaks in the
midst of difficult country, precipitous canyon walls, and many volcanic
craters cannot be seen from the ground without undue effort. Photographs
of bluffs, terraces, and other slopes facing bodies of water have
hitherto been adequately obtainable only from the water. All of these
can be readily viewed and photographed from the airplane. Pictorial
representations of drainage systems were rare until photographs such as
Figure 19 were taken from airplanes. The intricate drainage of marshes
like those along the Pamunkey River in Virginia pictured in Figure 20
was never accurately shown until photographed from the air.
Of frequent occurrence on the Atlantic Coastal Plain of the United
States are swamps and marshes inaccessible from the ground. Much of the
surface material is so soft that they cannot be easily traversed; and,
even where firm enough to support a man’s weight, few of the details are
deemed of sufficient importance to warrant the trouble and expense of
mapping by ordinary methods. Yet the trapper would scarcely admit that
these details are unimportant, and, to the student, they are an
interesting feature of marsh topography that has thus far received
little attention.
Figure 25 is part of the excellent New Kent, Va., sheet of the
topographic map and is probably as detailed as a map of this character
should be when made from ground surveys only. However, on comparison of
the map with a photograph of the same area (Fig. 24), there is no
difficulty in detecting errors; and it is probable that, had the
photograph been available when the map was made, the marshes would have
been represented differently.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account