The Fall of the Great Republic (1886-88)Coverdale, Henry Standish
History
The Fall of the Great Republic (1886-88)
Coverdale, Henry Standish
Imaginary wars and battles
A considerable body of soldiery was retained in barracks close without
the city till midsummer. The withdrawal of so many troops from the
frontier encouraged several of the Indian tribes, who had been most
cruelly cheated and robbed by the Government, to take the war-path. The
Gros-Ventres, the Nez-Percés, the Utes, and the Apaches revolted at
almost the same time, and began attacks on settlers and frontier posts.
The troops were ordered once more to the West; and before the middle
of July there was an even smaller proportion of the regular army east
of the great plains than before the Chicago outbreak.
This situation of affairs roused the better citizens, irrespective
of party, to the necessity for some action to protect other cities
from any attempt on the part of their socialists to imitate Chicago.
Congress was still in session. It had been debating a river and
harbor bill for two months, and had taken up, as a relief, the
momentous question whether a half-million-dollar post-office and
sub-treasury should be built at Mandan. There was every prospect that
two months more would be spent in orations and committee hearings
and bargainings over this question. The members, as usual, appeared
to have no conception of the needs of the country, and no regard
for any dangers which might menace it. A few attempts had been made
to secure some action which might avert the war with England, into
which the continued plots and crimes of Irishmen in the United States
were dragging the nation. But both parties were afraid of the Irish
vote,--more afraid of it than of committing a great wrong on a friendly
Government; and these attempts failed to secure any seconding from
either side. After the riot at Chicago, several set speeches had been
delivered,--that is to say, printed in the “Congressional Record,”--and
a committee had been appointed to investigate the matter. But the
committee was unable to decide whether the son of the senator from
Arkansas, who was chairman on the part of the Senate, or the nephew
of the member from Connecticut, who was chairman on the part of the
House, should be their secretary; and so they had not yet undertaken
to hear anything concerning the matter on which they were appointed.
The majority in both Houses reposed in a sort of intellectual and
moral torpor. When any member did partially awake, it was only to
cast his eye far enough into the future to scan the chances of his own
re-election.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account