The Family among the Australian Aborigines, a Sociological StudyMalinowski, Bronislaw
History
The Family among the Australian Aborigines, a Sociological Study
Malinowski, Bronislaw
Aboriginal Australians -- Social life and customs; Ethnology -- Australia; Families -- History
[354] "In the study of population ... the facts of
aggregation or grouping are the first to claim our
attention." (F. H. Giddings, _Princ. of Sociology_,
p. 79). In fact all the social phenomena of higher order
corresponding to differentiation and constitution depend
upon the facts of grouping. In the lowest societies, as
the Australian, the mode of living in very small groups
precludes _a priori_ the possibility of any higher social
formations. We may say that the social horizon of a
community extends as far as the contact of its members. In
higher societies this contact need not necessarily be an
actual one; as a rule in more developed communities members
of a social unit (nation, town, association) only come
exceptionally and in a diminutive degree into immediate
contact. But there are innumerable ways of mental contact.
On the contrary there is no other form of contact but the
personal one among the Australian blacks, and it is the
first condition for the formation of any social bonds
amongst them. In the discussion of all kinship bonds we
should never lose sight of the fact that it is highly
improbable that people who never were in personal contact
could feel more closely related than people who usually
live together.
[355] The importance of the aboriginal mode of living in
the study of family life and kinship bonds has been well
brought out by Dr. Westermarck (_H.H.M._, pp. 42 _sqq._,
especially pp. 43-47). His general inference--that in
low societies the scattered mode of living brings into
prominence individual kinship bonds, and isolates the
family unit--will be corroborated by our conclusions
drawn from the Australian material. The few Australian
examples--quoted and interpreted by Dr. Westermarck--have
been vehemently disputed by Herr Cunow (_loc. cit._, p. 122,
footnote). His criticism, if compared with the data
presented in this chapter, will appear quite unfounded.
Herr Cunow's book does not, by the way, deserve its good
reputation. There are many statements in it, given without
references, which I have been unable to verify in the first
hand evidence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account