The Fantasy Fan, March 1934: The Fans' Own Magazine — John Shaqi
The Fantasy Fan, March 1934: The Fans' Own MagazineVarious
History
The Fantasy Fan, March 1934: The Fans' Own Magazine
Various
Fan magazines; Fantasy fiction -- History and criticism -- Periodicals; Fantasy fiction -- Periodicals
“All in all; I think this semi-birthday issue is fine. But there are a
few things I would like to make comments about. ‘The Boiling Point’
should be eliminated, but the readers’ column should not be shortened!
I agree with Mrs. Wooley—you should not insert a contents page, and
thus cut out some interesting feature that could occupy the space. THE
FANTASY FAN is going places!”
—Bob Tucker
As this is only our seventh issue, we don’t believe it’s quite time to
celebrate our success(?)—however, we will be one year old in September
and might be better off by then and feel justified in whooping it up.
We take great pleasure in presenting the following letter from H.
Koenig. His letters are always thoroughly interesting and instructive
and we value them as much as some of our articles:
“The February issue of THE FANTASY FAN was splendid and a marked
improvement over the previous issue. It is rather difficult to pick out
any high spot; but the articles and stories by Lovecraft, Barlow,
Smith, and Petaja were all fine, to say nothing of the column, ‘Howl
from the Ether.’
“I particularly enjoyed Clark Ashton Smith’s article on M. R. James. It
was an admirable essay on an author who is far too little known and
appreciated on this side of the water, and I dare say, on the other
side also. Dr. James, who apparently has a tremendous amount of
antiquarian and archeological information at his fingertips, is also,
in my humble opinion, the greatest modern exponent of the ghost story.
I heartily second Smith’s recommendation that all lovers of the weird
and supernatural procure a copy of the Longman’s Green and Company
volume. They will not be disappointed. Incidentally, for the
information of readers who are perhaps interested in the separate
volumes of James’ work rather than in the complete collection, the
individual titles of his books (not mentioned in Smith’s article) are
as follows:
1. Ghost Stories of an Antiquary
2. More Ghost Stories of an Antiquary
3. A Thin Ghost and Others
4. A Warning to the Curious
“By the way, M. R. James should not be confused with G. P. R. James who
wrote that interesting romance, ‘The Castle of Ehrenstein, Its Lords
Spiritual and Temporal; Its Inhabitants Earthly and Unearthly.’ This is
a book, which, while probably somewhat tiresome to the general reader,
should prove of considerable interest to the student of the ghost story
(I am fortunate to have a first edition of this book in three volumes
published in 1847).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account