For instance, I had never taken any stock in the arguments for
vegetarianism upon the moral side. It has always seemed to me that
human beings have a right to eat meat, if meat is necessary for their
best development, either physical or mental. I have never had any
sympathy with that "humanitarianism" which tells us that it is our duty
to regard pigs and chickens as our brothers. I was listening the other
day to one of these enthusiasts, who had been reading aloud one of the
"Uncle Remus" stories, and who went on in touching language to set
forth the fact that his vegetable garden constituted one place where
"Bre'r Rabbit" was free to wander at will and to help himself; and he
described how happy it made him to see these gentle animals hopping
about among his cabbages, having lost all their fear of him. That sort
of thing will work very well so long as it is confined to one farm,
and so long as there is a hunting season upon all the other farms in
the locality; but let the humanitarians proceed to apply their regimen
in a whole state, and they will soon have so many billions of rabbits
hopping about among their cabbages that they will have to choose
between shooting rabbits or having no cabbages.
The reader, I presume, is familiar with calculations which show
the rate at which rabbits multiply, how many tens and hundreds of
millions would be produced by a single pair of rabbits in ten years.
It should be quite obvious that the time would come when all human
beings would be spending their energies in planting gardens to support
rabbits; and that if ever they stopped planting gardens, there would
be a famine for the rabbits, with infinitely more suffering than is
involved in the present method of keeping them down. Also, even though
the humanitarians might have their way with men, the hawks and the
owls and the foxes would probably remain unregenerate. I remember,
when I was a small boy, being sternly rebuked by an agitated maiden
lady who discovered me throwing stones at a squirrel. Not so many
days afterwards, however, the lady discovered the squirrel engaged in
carrying off young birds from a nest outside her window, and she found
her theories about "kindness to dumb animals" rudely disturbed.
The same thing, it seems to me, is still more true of domestic animals.
Domestic animals survive on earth solely because of the protection
of man, and for the sake of the benefits they bring to him. If it is
necessary to human health and well-being to slaughter a cow rather than
to wait and let her die of old age and lingering disease, it seems to
me that nothing but mawkish sentimentality would protest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account