The Fathers of Confederation: A Chronicle of the Birth of the DominionColquhoun, A. H. U. (Arthur Hugh Urquhart)
History
The Fathers of Confederation: A Chronicle of the Birth of the Dominion
Colquhoun, A. H. U. (Arthur Hugh Urquhart)
Canada -- History -- 1841-1867
federation confined to the Canadas, and Macdonald declared
unequivocally for federative union as a principle, arguing that a
strong central government should be the chief aim. {20} Brown's
resolutions were rejected, and the movement so auspiciously begun once
more exhibited an ominous tendency to subside. The varying fortunes
which attended the cause during these years resembled its previous
vicissitudes. It appeared as if all were for a party and none were for
the state. If those who witnessed the events of 1860 had been asked
for their opinion, they would probably have declared that the problem
was as far from solution as ever. Yet they would have been mistaken,
as the near future was to show. A great war was close at hand, and, as
war so often does, it stimulated movements and policies which otherwise
might have lain dormant. The situation which arose out of the Civil
War in the United States neither created nor carried Confederation, but
it resulted, through a sense of common danger, in bringing the British
provinces together and in giving full play to all the forces that were
making for their union.
[1] Address to Canadian Club, Ottawa, 1906.
[2] _Union of the Colonies_, by P. S. Hamilton, Halifax, 1864.
[3] See the chapter, 'Parties and Politics, 1840-1867,' by J. L.
Morison, in _Canada and its Provinces_, vol. v.
{21}
CHAPTER III
THE EVE OF CONFEDERATION
A day of loftier ideas and greater issues in all the provinces was
about to dawn. The ablest politicians had been prone to wrangle like
washerwomen over a tub, colouring the parliamentary debates by personal
rivalry and narrow aims, while measures of first-rate importance went
unheeded. The change did not occur in the twinkling of an eye, for the
cherished habits of two generations were not to be discarded so
quickly. Goldwin Smith asserted[1] that, whoever laid claim to the
parentage of Confederation, the real parent was Deadlock. But this was
the critic, not the historian, who spoke. The causes lay far deeper
than in the breakdown of party government in Canada. Events of
profound significance were about to change an atmosphere overladen with
partisanship and to strike the imaginations of men.
{22}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account