The Fathers of Confederation: A Chronicle of the Birth of the Dominion — John Shaqi
The Fathers of Confederation: A Chronicle of the Birth of the DominionColquhoun, A. H. U. (Arthur Hugh Urquhart)
History
The Fathers of Confederation: A Chronicle of the Birth of the Dominion
Colquhoun, A. H. U. (Arthur Hugh Urquhart)
Canada -- History -- 1841-1867
If a union, either partial or complete, should hereafter be proposed
with the concurrence of all the Provinces to be united, I am sure that
the matter would be weighed in this country both by the public, by
Parliament, and by Her Majesty's Government, with no other feeling than
an anxiety to discern and promote any course which might be the most
conducive to the prosperity, the strength and the harmony of all the
British communities in North America.
Nova Scotia, always to the front on the question, had declared for
either a general union or a union of the Maritime Provinces, and this
had drawn the dispatch of the Duke of Newcastle. A copy of this
dispatch was sent to Lord Monck, the governor-general of Canada, for
his information and guidance, so that the attitude of the Imperial
authorities was generally known. It remained for the various
provincial Cabinets to confer and to arrange a course of action. The
omens pointed to union in the near future. But, as it happened, a new
Canadian ministry, that of Sandfield Macdonald, had shortly before
assumed office, and its members were in no wise pledged to the {28}
union project. In fact, as was proved later, several of them, notably
the prime minister himself, with Dorion, Holton, and Huntington,
regarded federation with suspicion and were its consistent opponents
until the final accomplishment.
The negotiations for the joint construction of an intercolonial railway
had been proceeding for some time. These the ministry continued, but
without enthusiasm. The building of this line had been ardently
promoted for years. It was the necessary link to bind the provinces
together. To secure Imperial financial aid in one form or another
delegates had more than once gone to London. The Duke of Newcastle had
announced in April 1862 that the nature and extent of the guarantee
which Her Majesty's government would recommend to parliament depended
upon the arrangements which the provinces themselves had to propose.[4]
There was a conference in Quebec. From Nova Scotia came Howe and
Annand, who two years later fought Confederation; from New Brunswick
came Tilley and Peter Mitchell, who carried the cause to victory in
their province. Delegates from the Quebec meeting {29} went to London,
but the railway plan broke down, and the failure was due to Canada.
The episode left a bad impression in the minds of the maritime
statesmen, and during the whole of 1863 it seemed as if union were
indefinitely postponed. Yet this was the very eve of Confederation,
and forces already in motion made it inevitable.
[1] _Canada and the Canadian Question_, by Goldwin Smith, p. 143.
[2] _Life of Henry Pelham, fifth Duke of Newcastle_, by John Martineau,
p. 292.
[3] Between 1852 and 1870 there were thirteen colonial secretaries.
[4] Dispatch of the colonial secretary to the lieutenant-governor of
New Brunswick.
{30}
CHAPTER IV
THE HOUR AND THE MEN
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account