The Fathers of Confederation: A Chronicle of the Birth of the DominionColquhoun, A. H. U. (Arthur Hugh Urquhart)
History
The Fathers of Confederation: A Chronicle of the Birth of the Dominion
Colquhoun, A. H. U. (Arthur Hugh Urquhart)
Canada -- History -- 1841-1867
I think [he declared] the whole affair would fail and the system be a
failure if we adopted Mr Chandler's views. We should concentrate the
power in the federal government and not adopt the decentralization of
the United States. Mr Chandler would give sovereign power to the local
legislatures, just where the United States failed. Canada would be
infinitely stronger as she is than under such a system {68} as proposed
by Mr Chandler. It is said that the tariff is one of the causes of
difficulty in the United States. So it would be with us. Looking at
the agricultural interests of Upper Canada, manufacturing of Lower
Canada, and maritime interests of the lower provinces, in respect to a
tariff, a federal government would be a mediator. No general feeling
of patriotism exists in the United States. In occasions of difficulty
each man sticks to his individual state. Mr Stephens, the present
vice-president [of the Confederacy], was a strong union man, yet, when
the time came, he went with his state. Similarly we should stick to
our province and not be British Americans. It would be introducing a
source of radical weakness. It would ruin us in the eyes of the
civilized world. All writers point out the errors of the United
States. All the feelings prognosticated by Tocqueville are shown to be
fulfilled.
These and other arguments prevailed. Several of the most influential
delegates were in theory in favour of legislative union, and these were
anxious to create, as the best alternative, a general parliament
wielding {69} paramount authority. This object was attained by means
of three important clauses in the new constitution: one enumerating the
powers of the federal and provincial bodies respectively and assigning
the undefined residue to the federal parliament; another conferring
upon the federal ministry the right to dismiss for cause the
lieutenant-governors; and another declaring that any provincial law
might, within one year, be disallowed by the central body. Instead of
a loosely knit federation, therefore, which might have fallen to pieces
at the first serious strain, it was resolved to bring the central
legislature into close contact at many points with the individual
citizen, and thus raise the new state to the dignity of a nation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account