The Fayûm and Lake MœrisBrown, R. H. (Robert Hanbury)
History
The Fayûm and Lake Mœris
Brown, R. H. (Robert Hanbury)
Fayyum (Egypt) -- Description and travel; Moeris, Lake (Egypt)
But it is supposed that the Nile levels at that time were about
2 metres lower than they are now, and it is necessary to consider
in what way such a change of conditions would modify the views of
what Lake Mœris was and did, as given in the foregoing arguments
and calculations.
The supposition, or certainty, that the Nile in the time of Herodotus
was about 2 metres lower in level than it is now, is based on the
following observations, which Mr. Petrie has given me. He estimates
that the rate of rise has been about 4 inches a century. This, he
states, is shown by a Roman wall at Tanis and by the town-level of
Naukratis, both old towns in Lower Egypt. The old tombs at Memphis
are now under water. At Edfu the High Nile rises shoulder high on
the walls, which shows a rise of 4 inches or more per century. At
Aswân (Assouan) the records of High Niles on the Roman Nilometer
show that they were lower than now by an amount calculated at a rate
of 4 inches per century.
There is also, Mr. Petrie adds, other evidence of the same sort,
but less definite, giving the same general result.
If now we suppose the Fayûm (Lake Mœris) filled to R.L. 20·50
and emptied to R.L. 17·50, there is nothing to be changed in the
calculations, except the maximum and minimum surface levels of
the lake. Thus there would be a rather, but not much, larger area
reclaimed and the Edwah-Biahmu bank would have been formed along
the edge of the lake at lowest water, instead of in two metres of
water. This modified view of its formation would seem to be more
probable than that which supposed it to have been formed in water.
If, however, we suppose the lake still filled to R.L. 22·50
as a maximum, while its lowest level reached R.L. 17·50, the
discharges found to have been necessary to fill the lake (under the
conditions previously assumed excepting as regards minimum level),
must be increased by 50 per cent., and the figures representing the
return-flow be doubled.
In all probability the maximum level of the lake was somewhere
between R.L. 22·50 and 20·50, and may be taken as varying from
R.L. 22·00 to 21·00.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account