For the calendar year 1920 the gross "earnings"--more properly called
filcheries--of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks reached the stupendous
sum of $181,297,338, as against $102,380,583 for the calendar year
of 1919! Quite some money to suck from the teat of industry, isn't
it? The expenses for the calendar year of 1920 were $29,889,307, as
against $20,341,798 for the calendar year of 1919! Over nine million
dollars more in expense account but over seventy-eight million dollars
more in net "takings!" The net filcheries for the calendar year 1920
was the leviathan sum of $151,408,031, as against $82,038,785 for the
calendar year 1919. Almost a two-for-one shot and every dollar of it
peeled from industry's roll! And incidentally meditate on the titanic
expense accounts of these twelve tentacles--$29,889,307, or more than
an average of $2,490,000 apiece for the year 1920! Some luscious
salaries nesting and nestling there--to which reference will hereafter
be made--aren't there?
Here is a list of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks in the precise
order of their pillage with the percentage of their takings to their
paid in capital for the year 1920!
Per cent
Location Capital on Capital
New York $24,618,000 217.4
Chicago 13,213,000 195.6
Atlanta 3,759,000 162
San Francisco 6,412,000 159.1
Boston 7,454,000 137.3
Minneapolis 3,265,000 131.5
Kansas City 4,295,000 129.3
St. Louis 4,229,000 124.3
Cleveland 10,070,000 119
Philadelphia 8,278,000 116.8
Richmond 4,884,000 110.3
Dallas 3,757,000 89.3
The total capital employed was $94,234,000, the total net earnings
$151,408,031, and the average percentage of profit taken on this
capital--after charging most exorbitant expenses--was 160.7 per cent!
Is this a system of banking of, for and by the people, is this the
"emancipation of credit," or is it the hugest parasite ever engrafted
and wrapped about a nation's industry? Compare this with a savings bank
rate of 4 per cent or compare it with a high bank stock dividend rate
of 10 per cent! It's 40 times a savings bank rate, it's 16 times a
high bank stock dividend rate! It's unconscionable, excessive, unfair,
unjust, and a gigantic burden on industry's overloaded back. You're
satisfied--and tickled pink too--to get a safe 8 per cent return
on your investments, but your "emancipator of credit" wolfs down 20
times as much! Is this "credit emancipation" or is it the sandbagging
of industry? Is this twenty-to-one shot "conserving the nation's
resources" or is it practicing the arts of thuggery upon the real
production of real wealth? Is this "binding up the nation's wounds" of
finance or is it blood-letting to the point of exhaustion?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account