The Festival of Spring, from the Díván of Jeláleddín: Rendered in English Gazels after Rückert's Versions, with an Introduction and a Criticism of the Rubáiyát of Omar KhayyámJalal al-Din Rumi, Maulana
PhilosophySufism
The Festival of Spring, from the Díván of Jeláleddín: Rendered in English Gazels after Rückert's Versions, with an Introduction and a Criticism of the Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám
Jalal al-Din Rumi, Maulana
Omar Khayyam. Rubaiyat; Sufi poetry, Persian
From these principles flow a
thousand metaphors and poetical figures, which abound in the sacred
poems of the Persians and Hindus.'
2. _The poetical Imagery._—'Many zealous admirers of Hafiz insist, that
by _Wine_ he invariably means _devotion_; and they have gone so far as
to compose a Dictionary of Words in the _Language_, as they call it, of
the Súfis. In that vocabulary _sleep_ is explained by _meditation_ on
the divine perfections, and _perfume_ by _hope_ of the divine favour;
_gales_ are _illapses_ of grace; _kisses_ and _embraces_, the _raptures_
of piety; _idolaters_, _infidels_, and _libertines_ are men of the
purest _religion_, and their _idol_ is the Creator Himself; the _tavern_
is a retired Oratory, and its _keeper_ a sage instructor; _beauty_
denotes the _perfection_ of the Supreme Being; _tresses_ are the
_expansion_ of his glory; _lips_, the hidden mysteries of his essence;
_down_ on the cheek, the world of spirits, who encircle his throne; and
a _black mole_, the point of indivisible unity; lastly, _wantonness_,
_mirth_, and _ebriety_, mean religious ardour and abstraction from all
terrestrial thoughts.'—Sir William Jones' _Works_, vol. iv. pp. 219, 227.
_B_.
HEGEL ON THE CHARACTER OF THE PERSIAN LYRICAL POETRY.
Continuing the exposition quoted on p. xxi., Hegel goes on to
say:—
'In Sublimity proper, the best objects and the most splendid forms are
used only as a mere ornament of God, and they serve to proclaim the
magnificence and glory of the One, being brought before our eyes only to
glorify Him as the Lord of all creatures. But in Pantheism, on the
contrary, the Immanence of the Divine in the objects, raises the
mundane, natural, and human existence itself, to a more substantial
glory of its own. The actual Life of the Spiritual in the phenomena of
Nature and in human relationships, animates and spiritualises them in
themselves, and establishes in turn a special relation of the subjective
feeling and soul of the Poet to the objects of which he sings. His soul,
filled with this living glory, is in itself calm, independent, free,
self-sufficient, spacious, large; and in this affirmative identity with
itself, it expands its life in imagination till it attains to the same
calm unity in the Soul of things. And so it coalesces with the objects
of Nature and their magnificence, becomes one with the loved one, with
the cup-bearer, etc.;—in a word, with all that is worthy of praise and
of love, and this in the most blissful and joyous intimacy. The
Occidental Romantic inwardness of Soul shews, indeed, a similar
consciousness of Life in itself; but on the whole—especially in the
North—it is more unhappy, is not free, is given to yearning; or it
remains more subjectively shut up in itself, and thereby becomes selfish
and sensitive. Such oppressed, disturbed inner states of mind are
especially expressed in the National Songs of barbarous peoples. The
state of free, joyous inwardness is, on the contrary, characteristic of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account