The Fiction Factory: Being the experience of a writer who, for twenty-two years, has kept a story-mill grinding successfullyCook, William Wallace
Philosophy
The Fiction Factory: Being the experience of a writer who, for twenty-two years, has kept a story-mill grinding successfully
Cook, William Wallace
Authorship; Fiction
The old-style yellow-back hero was given to massacres. He slew his
enemies valiantly by brigades. Not so the modern hero of the five-cent
novel. Rarely, in the stories, does any one cross the divide. And
whenever the villain is hurt, he is quite apt to recover, thank the
hero for hurting him--and become his sworn friend.
The story must be _clean_, and while it must necessarily be exciting,
it must yet leave the reader's mind with a net profit in all the manly
virtues. Is this easy?
Please note this extract from a letter written by Harte & Perkins Dec.
25, 1902--it covers a point whose humor, Edwards thought, drew the
sting of dishonesty:
"Your last story, No. 285, opened well, had plenty of good incidents
and was interesting, but there are several points in which it might
have been improved.
Your description of Two Spot's scheme of posing Dutchy as a petrified
boy is amusing, but the plan was dishonest and a piece of trickery.
It was all right, perhaps, to let the boys go ahead without the
knowledge of the Hero, but when he learned of it he should have put
a stop to the plan immediately. It was all right to have him laugh
at it, but at the same time he should have spoken severely to the
boys about it and ordered them to return the money they had received
through their trick. He did not do this in your story and it was
necessary for me to alter it considerably in the first part on that
account.
The Hero is supposed to be the soul of honor, and in your story he is
posed as a party to a deception practised on the citizens of Ouray,
by which they were defrauded of the money they paid for admission
to see the supposed "petrified boy." Such conduct on his part would
soon lose for him the admiration of the readers of the weekly, as
it places him on a moral level, almost, with the robbers whom he is
bringing to justice."
Consider that, you Would-be-Goods, who are not above putting worse
things in your "high-class" work. And can you say "I am holier than
thou" to the conscientious writer who turns out his 20,000 or 25,000
words a week along these ethical lines? Handsome is as handsome does!
Somebody is going to write these stories. There is a demand for them.
The writer who can set hand to such fiction, who meets his moral
responsibilities unflinchingly, is doing a splendid work for Young
America.
And yet, as stated in a previous chapter, there are nickel novels
_and_ nickel novels--some to read and some to put in the stove unread.
High-minded publishers, however, are not furnishing the careful head of
the family with material for his kitchen fire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account