The Fijians: A Study of the Decay of CustomThomson, Basil
History
The Fijians: A Study of the Decay of Custom
Thomson, Basil
Ethnology -- Fiji; Fijians
[Footnote 90: Official Journal of Government Agent on _Lord of the
Isles_, 1882.]
[Footnote 91: _Text-book of Pathological Anatomy and Pathogenesis_
(English edition). London, 1885.]
[Footnote 92: Letter from Dr. William Gunn, Presbyterian missionary at
Futuna, dated September 14, 1893.]
[Footnote 93: Parliamentary Paper C. 634, and _Transactions of the
Epidemiological Society of London_, N.S., Vol. iii, 1884.]
[Footnote 94: _Nineteen Years in Polynesia._]
CHAPTER XVII
LEPROSY (_Vukavuka_ or _Sakuka_)[95]
No less than one per cent. of the native population of Fiji are lepers,
and, if native tradition is to be believed, the decay of customary law
has not affected the people in this respect either for better or for
worse. All the old men are familiar with the disease; they can diagnose
it with surprising accuracy; and they generally concur in stating that
it has neither spread nor decreased since heathen times.
The history of leprosy in the Pacific is remarkable. The Maoris have had
the disease ever since their arrival in New Zealand--certainly not less
than four centuries ago;[96] with the Fijians it is ancient enough to
have taken its place in their mythology. In Hawaii, on the other hand,
it seems to have been unknown before 1848, in New Caledonia before 1865,
and in the Loyalty Group before 1882.[97] It is impossible to speak with
certainty about the other groups, because the early voyagers did not
stay long enough to make accurate observations, and were prone to
mistake the disfigurements of scrofula and syphilis for the symptoms of
leprosy; the naval surgeons of the last century were generally men of
inferior attainments; and the missionaries, traders, and runaway sailors
who had the opportunity for leaving valuable information regarding
native diseases did not possess the necessary medical knowledge.
Moerenhout, who wrote in 1837, is the first to make undeniable reference
to it. In enumerating the diseases of the Society Islanders, he gives
an excellent description of the symptoms of leprosy under the native
name _Hobi_, which is identical with _Supe_[98] (H and B being
interchangeable with S and P), the Samoan term for leprosy, without a
suspicion of the real nature of the disease he was describing. It may,
therefore, be assumed that leprosy was endemic in Tahiti and the
adjacent islands long before the arrival of Europeans. Native tradition
seems to indicate that it was so in Tonga, and its history in islands
into which it has been recently introduced suggests that it was not a
recent arrival in any of the Polynesian groups except Hawaii. For,
whereas in Tahiti, New Zealand and Fiji it is no commoner now than it
was a century ago, in Hawaii it has increased so rapidly that in forty
years after its introduction it had infected one in every thirty of the
native population; in New Caledonia in twenty years it had infected
4000; and in the Loyalty Islands six years of the disease in Mare alone
had produced seventy lepers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account