The first French Republic : $b A study of the origin and the contents of the declaration of the rights of man, of the constitution, and of the adoption of the republican form of government in 1792Conaway, Horace Mann
History
The first French Republic : $b A study of the origin and the contents of the declaration of the rights of man, of the constitution, and of the adoption of the republican form of government in 1792
Conaway, Horace Mann
Constitutional history -- France; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799; Thesis (Ph. D.)
During discussion in the Assembly, August 1, M. Champion de Cicé, Bishop
of Auxerre, opposed a declaration as useless at that time, and said that
the example of North America was not conclusive, as that country only
contains proprietors, cultivators, and citizens all on the same social
footing. M. De la Luzerne, Bishop of Langres, also asserted that the
Constitution of an empire did not need a Declaration. M. Malouet, in
making strong protest against their placing the Declaration at the head
of the Constitution, portrayed the contrast between the situation of
France and that of America.[10] M. Delandine spoke in agreement with M.
Malouet.
On August 12, two projects for a Declaration of Rights were offered to
the Assembly: one of seventy-one articles, by Gonges-Carton of Quercy,
and one of twenty-four articles, by the Sixth Bureau of the Assembly.
On August 13, a committee of five, consisting of Desmeuniers, Bishop of
Langres, M. Tronchet, Count Mirabeau and M. Rhédon, was chosen to receive
the drafts of a Constitution and to recast these into one form.[11]
August 14, Mirabeau, on behalf of the committee, reported a scheme of a
Declaration containing nineteen articles. In speaking of the aim of the
committee, he said, that from the score of plans offered them, they had
sought, like the Americans, to construct a Declaration not of abstract
and scientific principles, but one of political truths that would readily
be comprehended by the popular mind.[12] In the debate of August 18 upon
the Declaration, M. Rabaud de Saint Étienne said that the Declaration of
Rights had been adopted because the _cahiers_ had asked it, and that the
_cahiers_ had asked it because the Americans had set the example, but
that this was no reason why the Declarations should be similar, for the
circumstances of the two nations were different.[13]
August 19, the Assembly decided to discuss first the Declaration of the
Sixth Bureau.[14] On August 21, after some debate, the Assembly adopted
the preamble of the plan, somewhat modified, presented by the committee
of five. M. Mounier then proposed three articles, which were adopted.
August 21, on the proposal of M. Alexander de Lameth, articles four,
five, and six, after discussion, were adopted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account