The first philosophers of Greece : $b An edition and translation of the remaining fragments of the pre-Sokratic philosophers, together with a translation of the more important accounts of their opinions contained in the early epitomes of their worksFairbanks, Arthur
Philosophy
The first philosophers of Greece : $b An edition and translation of the remaining fragments of the pre-Sokratic philosophers, together with a translation of the more important accounts of their opinions contained in the early epitomes of their works
Fairbanks, Arthur
Philosophy, Ancient
§ 9. Judged by the Herakleitos fragments which they yield, the works
of Clement and Hippolytos are hardly second in importance to Plutarch
for the student of early Greek philosophy. In the _Protreptikos_ of
Clement there is an interesting series of passages from Herakleitos on
popular worship; in the _Paedagogos_ and the first and fourth books of
the _Stromata_ there are scattered quotations most of which bear clear
marks of their secondary origin; book II contains several quotations
from the introduction to Herakleitos’ works; while the third and fifth
books of the _Stromata_ contain a much larger collection of passages
from Herakleitos, Xenophanes, Parmenides, and Empedokles. A casual
glance at the whole series of quotations shows that Clement’s method was
by no means uniform, and that he was often contented with a secondary
source for his quotations, not taking the trouble to look them up in the
original. In the first book of the _Stromata_ the first quotation from
Herakleitos is a proverb familiar in Greek literature, the second passage
a bare allusion to a sentence quoted by Plutarch, and the two remaining
ones refer to two quotations also given by Diogenes. That Clement
used the βίοι which were the basis of the work of Diogenes Laertios is
probable from his quotation of Parmenides 28-30 and Empedokles 26-28,
383-384. It is also highly probable that Clement found much of his
material in Stoic sources. It is generally agreed that in _Paedagogos_
ii. and iii. he freely used Musonius. Hera. 122 _ap._ Clement 188 ‘what
men do not expect at death’ is interpreted by Clement as referring to
Stoic fire, and Clement 649 (Hera. 123) also attributes to Herakleitos
and the Stoics an idea belonging to the latter only. Hera. 77 is alluded
to by Seneca as familiar to his Stoic readers, and other fragments cited
by Clement were apparently found by Philo in his Stoic sources. Hera.
69 _ap._ Clement 718 looks like another form of Hera. 19 which Plutarch
quotes from a Stoic source, and perhaps we may regard 20 also as from the
Stoic source from which Plutarch drew. Hera. 31 _ap._ Clement 87 includes
an added phrase (as to the stars) which appears also in _one_ of the two
passages in Plutarch where it is quoted. One of the lines of Parmenides
and six of the single lines of Empedokles given by Clement are also found
in Plutarch. Consequently I regard it as not improbable that Clement drew
quotations from Plutarch, and as all but certain that he drew from the
Stoic sources of Plutarch. The wrong interpretation of Hera. 116 (_ap._
Clement 699), 122 (_ap._ 18), 67 (_ap._ 261), 79 (_ap._ 111), and perhaps
27 (_ap._ 229) is additional proof that Clement was entirely unfamiliar
with the context in which these passages originally stood, and therefore
probably did not draw from the original. While we are quite unable to
trust Clement’s interpretation of his quotations, it should be remarked
that he is exceedingly careful to give the correct form (e.g. Hera. 101
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account