The first philosophers of Greece : $b An edition and translation of the remaining fragments of the pre-Sokratic philosophers, together with a translation of the more important accounts of their opinions contained in the early epitomes of their worksFairbanks, Arthur
Philosophy
The first philosophers of Greece : $b An edition and translation of the remaining fragments of the pre-Sokratic philosophers, together with a translation of the more important accounts of their opinions contained in the early epitomes of their works
Fairbanks, Arthur
Philosophy, Ancient
_ap._ Clement 586 as compared with the same fragment in Hippolytos; in
this quotation he gives the dialect forms with his usual fidelity).
It remains to consider several series of passages, and to ask whether
these were quoted at firsthand. In the _Protreptikos_ we find Herakleitos
fragments 122, 124, 125 together, and a little farther on 126-127 (cf.
122 _ap._ Clement 680, and 123 _ap._ 649) on the topic of popular
worship. These are clearly quoted from a connected passage, and not
phrases that have been passed on as proverbs. Moreover 124-127 are
somewhat closely connected with each other (perhaps 122 belongs with
them). It is evident that Clement (or possibly the immediate source of
Clement) drew them from a somewhat extended passage in the original.
Another series of passages from Herakleitos and Empedokles (_ap._ Clement
516 and 520) are quoted as illustrating the misery of human life. They
occur together in a long series of quotations on this topic, and at
least one line, Empedokles 404, is not quite pertinent; its lack of
fitness in this connection may mean that Clement is adapting a collection
of passages made (wholly or in part) by another hand for a slightly
different purpose. Again, a considerable number of fragments, especially
in books ii. and v. of the _Stromata_, are pithy proverbial statements
of the fundamental attitude of Herakleitos toward other men (cf. Herakl.
5-8, 104, 2-3, 49, 111 b with its addition from Demosthenes _de corona_ p.
324). These are all marked by their proverbial form, and are many of them
quoted by other writers. It is most natural to think that they were drawn
from a collection of Herakleitean sayings such as is presupposed by the
allusions of Marcus Aurelius and perhaps by the parody of Lucian.
As to the poetic citations in the fifth book of the _Stromata_ it seems
to me wholly likely that the verses of Xenophanes, and Parmenides
133-139, are quoted from the original poems. Empedokles lines 74 and 165
are repeated as proverbs; lines 33, 74, 104 (quoted with Herakleitos 68)
are often-quoted verses on the favourite topic of the elements; lines
342-343 are quoted with Herakleitos 49, lines 16-17 with Parmenides 28-30
and Herakleitos 111, and it is quite probable that Clement found the
topical groups of quotations ready to his hand. Empedokles 26 f., 55 f.,
81, 130 f., are all _introductory_ lines, and these too may have been
collected by some earlier writer. We may conclude, then, that many of the
citations in Clement were not taken from the original works, but that
some may have been; the most important fact is that Clement transcribes
his quotations with great faithfulness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account