The first philosophers of Greece : $b An edition and translation of the remaining fragments of the pre-Sokratic philosophers, together with a translation of the more important accounts of their opinions contained in the early epitomes of their worksFairbanks, Arthur
Philosophy
The first philosophers of Greece : $b An edition and translation of the remaining fragments of the pre-Sokratic philosophers, together with a translation of the more important accounts of their opinions contained in the early epitomes of their works
Fairbanks, Arthur
Philosophy, Ancient
Xenophanes is cited in passages varying in length from one to four lines.
Most of these passages are not known from other writers or known only
from late Homeric commentators. Where the same passage is cited twice,
there is no variation except in the arrangement of the lines. Fr. vii.
is given in part twice—once lines 3-4, and again lines 1, 2, and 4 (see
_supra_ p. 66).—From Parmenides (in addition to the line 132 given by
Plato and Aristotle) Sextus gives the proœmium of his work. Although
earlier editors have extensively rearranged this passage, I believe it
is substantially correct in Sextus, and I see no reason to doubt that it
was taken from the work itself. The citation of other lines before 53
by Plato and by Simplicius confirms the suspicion, however, that Sextus
had omitted something at this point. From Empedokles’ main philosophical
work Sextus gives a portion of the proœmium (lines 2-23), as well as four
lines from the introduction to the καθάρματα. It is reasonable to believe
that these lines with 428-435 were cited from the original poem; the
only errors are copyists’ blunders. Sextus also cites Empedokles 33-35
and 78-80. These are much copied lines, and the form in Sextus includes
some obvious errors, e.g. ἀήρ for αἰθήρ (l. 78) and φιλία for φιλότης
(l. 80), (cf. ἤπιον l. 79)—errors which very likely were found in the
source from which Sextus drew the lines.[119] We may conclude that Sextus
cited sometimes from the original, sometimes at second hand; and that his
citations reproduce his source accurately except that he sometimes omits
verses from their connection.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account