The Fly Leaf, No. 2, Vol. 1, January 1896: A Pamphlet Periodical of the New—the New Man, New Woman, New Ideas, Whimsies and ThingsVarious
General
The Fly Leaf, No. 2, Vol. 1, January 1896: A Pamphlet Periodical of the New—the New Man, New Woman, New Ideas, Whimsies and Things
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; American periodicals
It is altogether fitting and proper, as Abraham Lincoln would say if he
were not dead, that that there should be an immediate definition of the
“New God.” It is not easy to define the New Woman--not easy to define
the New Man, nor to formulate New Ideas, but, in these days, when the
passion for money getting over-shadows everything else in life, and
colors our religion and philosophy, with the cheap cynicism of poor
cheated greed, it is easy to define the New God. In the first place, He
is everything that the Old God was not; and that is saying everything
that the Modern Dives wishes said--and for which he pays his preacher.
The successful modern preacher has to be a man of great intellectual
parts, and some knowledge of affairs. He must be a man of the world,
for it is the function of a new prophet in a successful metropolitan
church to preach the New God. And this is most effectively done while
occupying the Old Pulpit. An adroit and conservative judicial spirit
has entirely renovated and made respectable the gift of prophecy in
the Christian church. So we see the churches filled with the social
charity of sweet and silken equality, and all things are kept as sweet
and peaceful as possible in this atmosphere that once reeked with
sulphurous fumes for the wicked. But the sweet savor of camphor and
smelling salts has stifled the sulphur,--and all other disagreeable
odors in God’s House.
The churches of today are mostly mausoleums in which rest the crumbling
remains of the ancient God. But an intellectual age still delights
in the glamor of impressive ritual, and his name and attributes are
enshrined in Creed, Decalogue and Hymn. But the old Law is serenely
disobeyed, with the assurance that the New God is much too good or much
too distant to perplex himself with the peccadillos of good society.
As a certain French countess said in the court of Louis XV., “The good
God would surely think twice before damning people of quality”--and
undoubtedly the New God is more liberal and refined than the old one.
The New God, like the cynic man of the world, takes the world as he
finds it. He is a being of an infinite indifference to syndicates
(_sin_-di-cates!), deals (in which lurks the de’il!), coal oil
monopolies (whence come endowments that throttle free speech on social
questions), sugar trusts (that capture Congress), and the ways of a man
with a maid--or, what is quite as wonderful--the ways of a new maid
with an old man.
The New God is a dilettante in religion, who winks (when bribed with a
good service in a fine church) and looks the other way when broad-cloth
and satin sow unto the flesh.
It is to be suspected that the New Girl in her way is better than the
New God. If the New Man becomes any worse, he ought to--well, it would
be impolitic to say what he ought to do. But between the New God and
the cynics of Mammon this world does not seem to promise the millennium
or Utopia just yet a while.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account