American literature -- Periodicals; American periodicals
But my wife, whose devotion to the severe goddess of literature is
somewhat vicarious, cannot altogether stifle some pangs of envy as she
regards the fine new silk dress of the janitor’s wife, or learns that
Mr. So and So, who is in the advertising business, has just given his
wife a new span of trotting horses for her new racing cutter. This
is enough to make a woman hiss invidious things about the calling of
literature.
A woman may love literature for her husband’s sake, or even for its
own, and yet she cannot help looking into the haberdashers’ and
milliners’ windows with wistful hungry eyes. And the goddess of
literature does not allow her votaries, especially the married ones,
anything but the shabbiest of shoddy drabs. So my wife declares that
one million out of seventy is a moderate and conservative estimate,
and she will not abate the figures one jot or tittle. I am convinced
that the feminine love of finery and comfort and elegance constitutes a
temperamental inadaptability to high aims in literature.
It all came about in this way: We were out marketing--my better half
and I--and we got mixed up with the crowd of swell people pouring into
the main entrance of the opera-house, and, as we passed under the
brilliantly lighted portico, my wife stopped a moment and peered in to
catch the name of MELBA on the billboard.
“We never go to see anything nowadays,” she said, a little regretfully,
as we moved on. Then we crossed the street and joined the shopping
crowd, pushing and elbowing in opposing streams on the other pavement,
and presenting an entirely different appearance to the radiant throng
about the opera-house. “Oh, well,” I answered, “you can’t expect
literature to prosper in a year of financial panics, depreciated
dollars and war scares. We must be content to just grub along.” “But
I should like to hear Melba and Calve--and I’ve not been to a single
Symphony this winter. Then, too, we’ve only seen one play, and that was
stupid. And we couldn’t even afford to go up in the gods to see Irving
or Beerbohm Tree. It’s a shame the way the speculators run the prices
up for everything good!”
“Well, you saw Otis Skinner in ‘Villon the Vagabond,’ and that was a
good bit of romantic acting.” “Oh, I know, but I do wish we didn’t
always have to go up in the gods.” “Get more performances for your
money.”
“If I could turn dramatic critic now--and, ’pon my soul, I don’t see
why not! The trick’s comparatively easy. _My father_ remembers the
great Edmund Kean, and I remember what he says of him; and then there
is theatrical literature in abundance.” “Oh, no; there’s no fun in
seeing a play if you’ve got to go home and write about it. You know
that. But there is no reason why we shouldn’t go to the opera and sit
in the best seats, if you only put all your energy and lots of good
things into what you call your organ of civilization. Of course it
should succeed--and once the book lovers and reading public know what
it really is, it _must_ succeed.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account