The Fly Leaf, No. 4, Vol. 1, March 1896 — John Shaqi
The Fly Leaf, No. 4, Vol. 1, March 1896Various
General
The Fly Leaf, No. 4, Vol. 1, March 1896
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; American periodicals
HERBERT ATCHISON COX.
A LITERARY ORDER.
TO THE LATEST CELEBRITY.
Dr. Sir:--Send us at once post-haste
1000 words--no matter what
The theme; 2 ideas--just a taste--
But make ’em up-to-date and hot.
P.S.
We find for 2 we have no room;
Babb’s soap requires a 2 pg. ad;
But never mind; we mean to boom
Your name while ’tis the newest fad.
Who cares a ---- for what’s inside
Now you are on the rising tide?
ADAM QUINCE.
A NEW BILL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO READERS.
Some of the things our industrious writers of today are doing, rather
incline us to regret that the craft has become so exemplary and
respectable. It may be that morality is served by the reformation of
Grub Street, but industry in literature is rather a fearful thing
when unaccompanied by other qualities of mind; and a good many
contemporary writers are more industrious than anything else. Indeed,
it has occurred to me, though I personally take nothing stronger than
tea, that a revival of loose living in the literary world would be a
God-send to discriminating readers, as we might then cherish the hope
that some of our popular novelists would perish ignominously, like poor
Kit Marlowe, before they could put in their cheap, slop literature on
the strength of their first bit of genuine work.
It is noticeable that of nearly all our contemporary writers it is true
that their best work was done first in obscurity. With success came
easy writing and slop literature for the bag-men of the syndicates.
This is the most severe criticism that can be made on them, for a
writer who respects himself should strive to continue developing
until forty. It is a pity some of our writers cannot meet a bad end
early in life, for in that case they would leave a fame unspoiled and
unsmirched with endless scamp work done for the speculators in literary
reputations.
If, perhaps, two-thirds of the present brood of fiction writers had
died, or been cut off in their first flush, we should have just so much
good literature without being compelled to sift it out of much “boomed”
rubbish.
Max Nordau claims that the writers of today are degenerates. As far
as our literature is concerned, the majority of our popular writers
have no such valid claim to serious consideration. It is conceivable
that degenerates may produce priceless and imperishable literature.
Our writers are mostly merely sober and respectable tinkers, and they
imperil the intellectual development of the race by coddling themselves
so well that they threaten to live as long as Queen Victoria.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account