The foreign debt of English literature — John Shaqi
The foreign debt of English literatureTucker, T. G. (Thomas George)
History
The foreign debt of English literature
Tucker, T. G. (Thomas George)
Comparative literature; English literature -- History and criticism
Next to Homer may come, by no means in importance, but in date, the poet
Hesiod. He, too, uses the hexameter line, but with a different tone and
movement, and for quite another purpose. He is our first example of
“didactic” verse—the verse which is intended to instruct. Hesiod, who may
be dated about the year 700 B.C., composed two poems of some dimensions,
the one called the _Theogony_ or _Pedigree of the Gods_, the other known
as the _Works and Days_. The latter is a collection of versified rules
of agriculture mixed with proverbial wisdom. It is, in fact, a sort
of “Farmer’s Annual” of Greece combined with the proverbial wisdom of
“Poor Richard.” Practical farming and practical morals go together. It
would almost certainly have been written in prose, but for the simple
reason that prose literature had not yet been invented. All literary
composition begins with verse. As a poem, there is little to be said for
the _Works and Days_, except that, like all things early Greek, it is
entirely unpretentious and goes straight to the point. Didactic verse
has grown common since Hesiod’s day, although happily it is now seldom
used for agricultural purposes. Tusser’s _Five Hundred Points of Good
Husbandry_ is one of the earliest results of the revival of Greek studies
in England in the Elizabethan time, and, though it cannot count for much
in literature, it is our first example of a species of work which took a
more moralizing shape in Dyer’s _Fleece_ and many later didactics.
Of much more value is the next kind of poetry which arose among the
Greeks, a kind which has been called “personal,” inasmuch as it is
prompted by the writer’s individual feelings and emotions, and has
reference to himself, his hopes, griefs, loves, and other sentiments.
The epic poetry of Homer had been purely objective, dealing with
incidents, things, and men outside the poet. The author makes no
revelation of himself; he does not speak in the first person. But what
is known as “lyric” and “elegiac” poetry is the outcome of a man’s own
inner experience, and is only valuable in proportion as it expresses
powerfully or touchingly a real or imagined passion of the writer,
which the world at large can also recognize for its own. The poetry of
_Lycidas_, _Adonais_, _In Memoriam_, is “elegiac”; the poetry of songs,
such as those of Herrick and Burns, is “lyric.” “Elegiac” properly means
“adapted to mourning,” but the elegy, with its couplet rhythm varied from
the hexameter, yet with a plaintive dignity all its own, was used for
other feelings than those of grief. It was used for praise, exhortation,
reflection, love; for anything “subjective,” or springing from the mood
of the writer. We need not enumerate the Greeks who at various dates
wrote poetry of this personal description. After the year 700 B.C. there
were many and excellent lyrists of the kind. At Lacedaemon the poet
Tyrtaeus composed marching songs, which acted upon the Spartans as the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account