The foreign debt of English literatureTucker, T. G. (Thomas George)
History
The foreign debt of English literature
Tucker, T. G. (Thomas George)
Comparative literature; English literature -- History and criticism
Imagine for a moment that the Bible did not exist, that no Englishman had
ever read one line of it, that the religious notions which it inculcates
were without expression in any such established standard. Our way of
looking at life and at things suprasensual, our maxims of conduct, our
ideals of feeling, would obviously be something widely unlike those
which we now entertain. A nation’s literature is the expression of a
nation’s soul. Give us a different soul, and the expression will convey
that difference. We cannot separate literature from moral conceptions
and moral tone, and therefore, in a sense, the Hebrews have determined
our literature more than all other influences combined. And there is
this manifest and vastly important difference between the influence of
the Bible and the influence of any other work. The Biblical thoughts
have become part of our earliest, youngest, and most plastic selves.
We are born into them, and brought up in them, as something natural to
ourselves. The English heart and mind are now partly made of Hebrew
thoughts and ideals. This fact is so obvious that we need not pursue
it further. To other literatures we have looked for models to imitate
and notions to borrow; to the Biblical literature we have looked for a
transfusion of all our thinking.
But there is also a purely literary effect of the Bible, concerning which
a few words must be said. Who can estimate the immense extent to which
Biblical imagery and Biblical phrase—what one may call Biblical style
and Hebrew style—have determined the style of English writers? Remember
that the average English child is brought up on the Bible, that he reads,
marks, learns, and inwardly digests it; that its diction and its figures
of speech persist, however loosely, in his memory. What is the result?
Is it not that, though in a less degree than with the Puritans, there
remains, consciously or unconsciously, a habit of imitating those figures
and further developing them; of imitating that diction, and carrying
it into his higher forms of speech and his writings? Take the great
preachers and religious prose writers from Jeremy Taylor to Cardinal
Newman, and observe how their language unconsciously follows the rhythm,
clothes itself in the dignity, and repeats the very phraseology, of the
authorized version of the scriptures. Take poets like Milton, or mere
verse-writers like Akenside, and see how their language seems to echo the
language of the Testaments, Old and New.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account