The foreign debt of English literatureTucker, T. G. (Thomas George)
History
The foreign debt of English literature
Tucker, T. G. (Thomas George)
Comparative literature; English literature -- History and criticism
he is using the only two adjectives which the place required, and which
it truthfully admits. They are exactly the two epithets which a Greek
might put. Yet, no doubt, the untutored mind asks for something more
assertive, something which will cut more sharply or press more heavily
into the unready imagination. Than _Mycerinus_, than _Sohrab and Rustum_,
than _Philomela_, _Thyrsis_, or _The Strayed Reveller_, one can find
nothing more absolutely Greek in point of execution, though one may know
Greek passages which stir profounder emotional depths.
Tennyson’s debts to classical authors have been treated by Mr. Churton
Collins in a monograph. That critic is right in saying that the knowledge
of a scholar is requisite to appreciate Tennyson fully, however much
he may be appreciated by those who are no scholars. No man has ever
been better read in previous poetry than Tennyson, and no man has known
better how to assimilate what he found, or has possessed a surer tact and
taste in using it. With Tennyson the Greek matter is, as with Milton,
imbedded in his own, not overlaid. Greek forms of verse are moulded to
his purpose. The Greek style, describing what is luminously seen in a few
luminous touches, is ever conspicuous. He neither tries to disguise his
borrowings, nor does he obtrude them. When he says, “for now the noonday
quiet holds the hill,” he is translating Callimachus; when “the charm
of married brows,” Theocritus; when “shadowy thoroughfares of thought,”
Sophocles; when “sitting well in order smite the sounding furrows,”
Homer. His device of making the sound answer to the sense, as in
I heard the water lapping on the crag,
And the long-ripple washing in the reeds,
is a common device of the Greeks. In point of form his _Œnone_ is
modelled on Theocritus; his _Ulysses_ and his _Tithonus_ are framed after
the soliloquies in Greek plays. His _Lotus-eaters_ gets its matter from
Homer, Bion, and Moschus. Everywhere we meet hints and reminiscences
of Simonides, or Pindar, or Theocritus, or Anacreon. But these are all
incorporated, amalgamated in a body of work which is wholly in keeping
with them in taste, in tone, in diction—in short, in style.
This age of ours, to put it briefly, has been an age of stylists, of
artists who work on principles derived from their education in Greek,
and their love, which every scholar feels, of that glorious and undying
literature.
BRIEF CONSPECTUS OF GREEK LITERATURE.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account