There was in the polished air, and calm, dispassionate delivery of the
speaker, something which seemed to charm the ears of those who for four
hours before had been so mercilessly assailed by all the vituperation
and insolence of party animosity. It was, so to say, a period of relief
and repose, to which even antagonists were not insensible. No man ever
understood the advantage of his gifts in this way better than Upton, nor
ever was there one who could convert the powers which fascinated society
into the means of controlling a popular assembly, with greater assurance
of success. He was a man of a strictly logical mind, a close and acute
thinker; he was of a highly imaginative temperament, rich in all the
resources of a poetic fancy; he was thoroughly well read, and gifted
with a ready memory; but, above all these,--transcendently above them
all,--he was a “man of the world;” and no one, either in Parliament or
out of it, knew so well when it was wrong to say “the right thing.” But
let us resume our quotation:--
“For more than three hours did the House listen with breathless
attention to a narrative which in no parliamentary experience has been
surpassed for the lucid clearness of its details, the unbroken flow of
its relation. The orator up to this time had strictly devoted himself
to explanation; he now proceeded to what might be called reply. If
the House was charmed and instructed before, it was now positively
astonished and electrified by the overwhelming force of the speaker's
raillery and invective. Not satisfied with showing the evil consequences
that must ensue from any adoption of the measures recommended by the
Opposition, he proceeded to exhibit the insufficiency of views always
based upon false information.
“'We have been taunted,' said he, 'with the charge of fomenting discords
in foreign lands; we have been arraigned as disturbers of the world's
peace, and called the firebrands of Europe; we are exhibited as parading
the Continent with a more than Quixotic ardor, since we seek less the
redress of wrong than the opportunity to display our own powers
of interference,--that quality which the learned gentleman has
significantly stigmatized as a spirit of meddling impertinence,
offensive to the whole world of civilization. Let me tell him, sir, that
the very debate of this night has elicited, and from himself too, the
very outrages he has had the temerity to ascribe to us. His has been
this indiscriminate ardor, his this unjudging rashness, his this
meddling impertinence (I am but quoting, not inventing, a phrase),
by which, without accurate, without, indeed, any, information, he has
ventured to charge the Government with what no administration would
be guilty, of--a cool and deliberate violation of the national law of
Europe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account