The Foundations of the Origin of Species: Two Essays written in 1842 and 1844Darwin, Charles
Philosophy
The Foundations of the Origin of Species: Two Essays written in 1842 and 1844
Darwin, Charles
Evolution (Biology); Natural selection
{354} This is an illustration of the general theory of barriers
(_Origin_, Ed. i. p. 347, vi. p. 494). At i. p. 391, vi. p. 544 the
question is discussed from the point of view of means of transport.
Between the lines, above the words "with that land," the author
wrote "Cause, formerly joined, no one doubts after Lyell."
{355} _Origin_, Ed. i. p. 390, vi. p. 543.
{356} See _Origin_, Ed. i. p. 397, vi. p. 552.
{357} The Cape de Verde and Galapagos Archipelagoes are compared in
the _Origin_, Ed. i. p. 398, vi. p. 553. See also _Journal of
Researches_, 1860, p. 393.
The Galapagos Archipelago offers another, even more remarkable, example
of the class of facts we are here considering. Most of its genera are,
as we have said, American, many of them are mundane, or found
everywhere, and some are quite or nearly confined to this archipelago.
The islands are of absolutely similar composition, and exposed to the
same climate; most of them are in sight of each other; and yet several
of the islands are inhabited, each by peculiar species (or in some cases
perhaps only varieties) of some of the genera characterising the
archipelago. So that the small group of the Galapagos Islands typifies,
and follows exactly the same laws in the distribution of its
inhabitants, as a great continent. How wonderful it is that two or three
closely similar but distinct species of a mocking-thrush{358} should
have been produced on three neighbouring and absolutely similar islands;
and that these three species of mocking-thrush should be closely related
to the other species inhabiting wholly different climates and different
districts of America, and only in America. No similar case so striking
as this of the Galapagos Archipelago has hitherto been observed; and
this difference of the productions in the different islands may perhaps
be partly explained by the depth of the sea between them (showing that
they could not have been united within recent geological periods), and
by the currents of the sea sweeping _straight_ between them,--and by
storms of wind being rare, through which means seeds and birds could be
blown, or drifted, from one island to another. There are however some
similar facts: it is said that the different, though neighbouring
islands of the East Indian Archipelago are inhabited by some different
species of the same genera; and at the Sandwich group some of the
islands have each their peculiar species of the same genera of plants.
{358} In the _Origin_, Ed. i. p. 390, a strong point is made of
birds which immigrated "with facility and in a body" not having
been modified. Thus the author accounts for the small percentage of
peculiar "marine birds."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account