New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
Land travel continued both difficult and costly in all the colonies
throughout the whole of the earlier industrial period, and roads were so
poor, even a century after New England was settled, that not until 1722
was a team driven for the first time from Connecticut to Rhode Island.
To emphasize the effect of rivers, we may note that in New York, where
the Hudson was the highway, the average cost of carrying a bushel of
wheat one hundred miles was but two pence, compared with a shilling in
Pennsylvania, where forty wagons, one hundred and sixty horses, and
eighty men were required to transport the same amount of freight handled
by two or three men on a scow in New York. This high cost of land
carriage, which, added to the ocean freights, had the effect of
fostering home manufactures as against importations from England, also
restricted the areas of distribution, and tended to localize
industry.[5]
Footnote 5:
V. S. Clark, _History of Manufactures in the U. S., 1607-1860_
(Carnegie Institution, Washington, 1916), pp. 88 _ff._
It was not, however, merely the lack of an adequate system of river
transport that served to stimulate manufacturing in New England in
competition with the mother-country. The character of such rivers as she
possessed peculiarly adapted them for the purpose of supplying power,
for not only are falls and rapids numerous in all of them, but the
“fall-line” in New England is nearer tidewater than it is anywhere else
along the coast. In addition, the regularity of the rainfall, and the
great number of lakes, which form natural reservoirs, cause the flow of
the rivers to be more constant than in other parts of the country. From
all these causes, the little Merrimac, for example, which is otherwise
insignificant as an American river, is the most noted water-power stream
in the world.[6]
Footnote 6:
_Report on the Water-Power of the U. S_.; Census Report, 1885.
The soil of New England is of glacial origin, about three quarters of it
being of boulder-clay, stubborn in character and difficult to cultivate,
but of fair and lasting fertility, due to the steady decomposition of
the smaller pebbles. The remainder, largely in the southeast, is sandy
and of little or no use for agriculture, owing to the rapid draining
away of all moisture.[7] That on the uplands is thinner and poorer than
in the valleys, and the uplands predominate.
Footnote 7:
N. S. Shaler, _United States_, vol. 1, p. 54.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account