New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
Hutchinson, _Papers_, vol. I, pp. 223 _ff._; J. Winthrop, _History_,
vol. II, pp. 348 _ff._ Prof. G. L. Kittredge has recently written an
elaborate account of Dr. Child—"Doctor Robert Child the Remonstrant,"
reprinted from _Publications, Col. Soc., Mass._, 1919. It is a strong
brief in defense of the action taken by the Massachusetts authorities,
and contains the fullest and most accurate account of the Petition and
the subsequent trials yet written. Prof. Kittredge is a firm supporter
of the old theory that Child was plotting to overthrow the government
in the interests of Presbyterianism. While this may be so, it seems
not to cover the cases of the other remonstrants. The main interest of
the affair for our present work, however, lies in the evidence
afforded of discontent with the Puritan regime, and in that
connection, Prof. Kittredge, after showing the extreme diversity of
views held by the signers on most matters, speaks of “their discontent
with the administration which was the sole binding element common to
all the Remonstrants” (p. 29). He also states (p. 52), that “there was
more or less public sentiment in favor of the defendants.”
Footnote 520:
_Massachusetts Records_, vol. II, pp. 196, 199, 205, 241.
The tide of popular rights in the colonies was rising, however, and “all
the troubles of New England” were “not at the Massachusetts,” as Winslow
wrote to Winthrop, nor were high-handed proceedings wholly limited to
that commonwealth. In Plymouth, a written proposal, favored by many of
the inhabitants and of the deputies, was presented to the General Court,
“to allow and maintaine full and free tollerance of religion to all men
that would preserve the civill peace and submit unto government.” “You
would have admired [wondered] to have seen,” wrote Winslow, “how sweet
this carrion relished to the pallate of most of the deputies.”
“Notwithstanding it was required, according to order, to be voted,” the
Governor would not permit any vote to be taken; and the effort thus to
extend to others the same freedom that the leading founders of the
colony had availed themselves of for twelve years in Holland was
summarily suppressed.[521]
Footnote 521:
Letter of Winslow to Winthrop, in Hutchinson, _Papers_, vol. I, p.
174.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account