New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
All of the colonies had shown the tendency toward expansion. Plymouth
had started her trading posts on the rivers of Maine and Connecticut;
settlements multiplied in Rhode Island; New Haven, from the meadows of
Quinnipiack, was soon planting on Long Island, and nearing the Dutch
boundaries on the Sound; while Connecticut, through her purchase of
Saybrook from the disappointed patentees in 1644,[553] and her planting
of towns westward even of New Haven's expansion, was rapidly stretching
east and west. Massachusetts had long adopted the definite policy of
extending her claims and control as fast and as far as possible. In the
race for land and power, her numbers, resources, and central position,
all gave her immense advantages, to which was added the no mean one of
an unscrupulous disregard for the prior rights of others. On the one
hand, then, the weaker colonies might hope to gain from union some
protection, not only from the Indian and the foreigner, but from the
growing aggressiveness of Massachusetts. On the other, that colony might
anticipate dominating the councils of the Confederacy, while free scope
was still left for her own aggrandizement.
Footnote 553:
_Conn. Col. Records_, vol. I, pp. 266 _ff._
Although they were far inferior to her as military powers, the
acknowledgment of Plymouth, Connecticut, and New Haven as of equal
political weight in the Union served largely to protect them against the
Bay Colony; but there was no such protection for Maine or for the towns
in Rhode Island, which were refused admission to the league. The
inhabitants of the former were not received, Winthrop wrote, because the
people of Agamenticus had recently “made a taylor their mayor, and had
entertained one Hull, an excommunicated person, and very contentious,
for their minister.”[554] These somewhat surprising reasons for refusing
representation to the few inhabitants of a territory equal in size to
all the rest of New England combined may be dismissed as not the true
ones. We are more likely to find the latter in that new interpretation
of her charter by which Massachusetts laid claim to all this vast tract,
which she formally annexed ten years later. To have allowed its
inhabitants representation in the proposed confederacy would have been
to acknowledge their right to be considered an independent colony, and
so would have placed awkward moral obstacles in the way of the manifest
destiny of God's elect. In regard to the Rhode Island plantations, in
spite of Winthrop's affection for Williams, the Bay Colony had always
exhibited a vindictive spite, the extreme virulence of which it is
somewhat difficult to understand, even after making all allowances for
the known facts. In 1640, under the administration of Dudley, the
Massachusetts General Court had received a letter from the magistrates
of Connecticut, New Haven, and Aquidneck, “wherein they declared their
dislike of such as would have the Indians rooted out,” and their desire
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account