New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
of “seeking to gain them by justice and kindness,” although carefully
watching them for any hostile intent. While the Massachusetts Court
voted its assent, it also insisted that the answer should be addressed
only to the magistrates of Connecticut and New Haven, formally excluding
any communication with those of Aquidneck “as men not to bee capitulated
withall by us, either for themselves or the people of the iland where
they inhabit.”[555] Silly bigotry, as well as intercolonial discourtesy,
could hardly go further than in this childish refusal even to discuss a
humanitarian project of importance and of common interest. The real
motive, however, may have been, as in the case of Maine, to leave the
way open to annexation by refusing to acknowledge any separate
government; and when, a year after the confederacy was formed, the Rhode
Island towns applied for admission, the answer, undoubtedly dictated by
Massachusetts, was an “utter refusall” unless they would “absolutely and
without reservacon submitt” to either Plymouth or herself.[556]
Footnote 554:
J. Winthrop, _History_, vol. II, p. 121.
Footnote 555:
J. Winthrop, _History_, vol. II, p. 24; _Massachusetts Records_, vol.
I, p. 305.
Footnote 556:
_Acts United Colonies_, vol. I, p. 23.
At the time of the formation of the Confederacy, Massachusetts had just
driven the entering wedge at Providence and absorbed New Hampshire, and
was engaged in encroaching upon the northern bounds of Plymouth and
Connecticut. The three smaller colonies, therefore, had everything to
gain by having their existence recognized by being admitted as political
equals in the league; while they were further protected by the third
clause in the Articles, which guaranteed the independence of each of
them, and even forbade the voluntary union of any colony with another
without consent of the Confederation. On the other hand, Massachusetts,
with the rich territories to the north and south—which she was already
absorbing—left open to her, had also much to gain by having a body that
could give some sort of legal approval to her illegal poachings; and her
own power, in extreme circumstances, could be counted upon to nullify
any adverse vote. These were probably the reasons which induced her to
enter a Confederation in which her two commissioners had only an equal
voting power with those of each of the three smaller colonies in the
governing board of eight.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account