New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
The issuance of this patent was immediately followed by an attempt at
settlement, de Monts and Champlain, both of whom had previously been in
Canada, sailing with a hundred and twenty men in the spring following
the receipt of the grant. Buildings were erected, and the first winter
passed on the island of St. Croix, in the mouth of the river of the same
name, which empties into Passamaquoddy Bay.[75] It was thus the first
authorized attempt to colonize any part of New England. The choice of a
site had been unfortunate, and in the following spring, the colony
removed to Nova Scotia, where it lasted two years more before the
cancellation of the grant resulted in its abandonment. A lively and
entertaining account of life in the colony was written by a genial
lawyer, who was one of its members, and the attention with which
American affairs were then being watched is indicated by the appearance
of an English translation in the same year in which the original came
out in Paris.[76] During the three years of his stay, Champlain was
indefatigable in exploring the coast, making three principal voyages
along the shores of New England, which he described and mapped as far
south as the present settlement of Chatham, in Massachusetts.
Footnote 75:
H. S. Burrage, _Beginnings of Colonial Maine_ (Portland, 1914), p. 32.
Footnote 76:
Marc Lescarbot, _Histoire de la Nouvelle France_; Paris, 1609.
The coast of Maine and the shores of Massachusetts Bay were carefully
studied for sites for settlement, and the former was for long to form a
debatable land between French and English. These years also saw the
foundation laid of the friendship between French and Indian, which was
to cost the English dear. De Monts's patent contemplated trade with the
natives, rather than an agricultural colony; and the French empire in
America, as has already been noted, consisted mainly of a series of
trading-posts. It was to the interest of the French that the Indian
should remain, as he himself wished, a hunter; whereas the growth of the
English agricultural colonies denied him the possibility of continuing
his savage life, without, on the other hand, absorbing him into
civilization. It was not merely that the French, in the main, were
tactful and friendly, accepting the Indian as he was, and even
intermarrying, while the English were harsh and disdainful. It may be
said that one Indian required to sustain his life approximately as many
square miles as the English agriculturist, with his domestic animals,
needed acres. On the other hand, the uses to which the French put the
soil were identical with those for which it served the savage. The
English, indeed, “bought” land, which the French never did; but the
French and the Indian shared the soil to the profit of both, while the
English deprived the native of his means of subsistence, in exchange for
coats and beads.[77] Not that they did so intentionally; but the
consequence was inevitable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account