New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
In a trial before the High Commission, in 1567, of certain Puritans who
had hired a hall ostensibly for a wedding, and had then held an illegal
prayer meeting in it, one of them claimed that he should be tried only
by the word of God. “But,” said the dean, “who will you have to judge of
the word of God?”[184] The obvious answer, which every Puritan, from
then to now, has made, is that he alone is such an interpreter, not
merely for himself, but for the entire community. It was natural, with
the Puritans' idea of God, that they should take special delight in the
Old Testament. From it, almost exclusively, they drew their texts, and
it never failed to provide them with justification for their most
inhuman and bloodthirsty acts. Christ did, indeed, occupy a place in
their theology, but in spirit they may almost be considered as Jews and
not Christians. Their God was the God of the Old Testament, their laws
were the laws of the Old Testament, their guides to conduct were the
characters of the Old Testament. Their Sabbath was Jewish, not
Christian. In New England, in their religious persecutions and Indian
wars, the sayings of Christ never prevailed to stay their hands or to
save the blood of their victims.[185]
Footnote 184:
Usher, _High Commission_, p. 58.
Footnote 185:
This did not, however, imply any love for living Jews. _Cf._ D. deS.
Pool, “Hebrew Learning among the Puritans of New England prior to
1700,” in _American Jewish Historical Society Publications_, vol. XX,
p. 57.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account