New England -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
Puritanism was essentially a movement of protest, and so was largely
negative. In fact, to such a degree was it a matter of protest and
negation, that the Puritan became absolutely fascinated in his
contemplation of that first great protestor and protagonist of negation,
the devil himself. It has frequently been pointed out that, in the one
great poem which the movement has given us, the “Paradise Lost” of
Milton, the real hero is Satan, and that it is upon him that the poet's
interest centres. The Puritan's relations with the Deity were not merely
fatalistic, but were expressed in the legal form of a covenant in which
God and the individual were the contracting parties. Drama, or
melodrama, was supplied only by the devil, who, from that standpoint,
may almost be said to have been the saving grace of the Puritan
doctrine. Men become eloquent over what appeals to their interest; and
it is noteworthy that not only did the finest English Puritan poem
centre about the devil, but the finest American Puritan prose was to be
devoted to the horrors of hell, and that Jonathan Edwards was to find
the last touch to the felicity of Heaven in the saints' contemplation of
the tortures inflicted upon the damned by the Arch-fiend in the depths
below.
It was, as we have said, natural sympathy that attracted the Puritans to
the Old Testament, that long protest against paganism, with its “thou
shalt nots.” The positive side of the New Testament seems to have left
them singularly cold. Indeed, so little appeal did the words of even
Christ himself make, that, for once, they abandoned their literalism in
the quoting of texts, and doubted whether the use of the Lord's Prayer
should be permitted, as it savored too much of ritualism. The Puritans'
virtues were thus mainly negations. Their ideals were based almost
wholly upon mere avoidance of sin. They sought complete surrender of
will. Humanity, in their eyes, was so utterly an evil thing, that only
by an undeserved act of the grace of God was it possible that even a few
human beings could possibly do anything pleasing in his sight.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account