The "free press" : $b portrait of a monopoly — John Shaqi
The "free press" : $b portrait of a monopolyMarion, George
History
The "free press" : $b portrait of a monopoly
Marion, George
Press -- United States
The increasingly monopolistic character of the press has made its
control by Big Business an automatic process. But it has had still
another result: to put the press under the influence of the most
reactionary, least responsible wing of Big Business. The direct agency
of this influence is the more openly pro-fascist section of the
press. Unfortunately, progressives cling to the illusion that this
section of the press is a sort of fanatical “fringe,” ill-regarded
in the trade. That is an illusion, a dangerous one. This so-called
“fringe” section comprises the chains owned by Hearst, Roy Howard and
Patterson-McCormick. Their combined direct circulation, according to
the Editor and Publisher Yearbook for 1944, was 9,649,108 daily and
13,578,687 Sunday, roughly a quarter of all newspaper circulation.
Moreover, the readers of newspapers subscribing to the Hearst
International News Service, which carries the Hearst political line in
full, should be added to the direct circulation figures. A tabulation
from the 1944 Yearbook shows I.N.S. was sold to 290 daily and 104
Sunday papers in 220 cities and towns of 38 states. Total circulation
of I.N.S.-subscribing papers was 15,827,856. This figure, plus the
circulation of the papers in the three chains (after eliminating
duplications) gives 22,043,146 as the actual audience of the three
chainsters--half the national circulation!
It is only the beginning. They also own all the important feature
syndicates and the two private news agencies, U.P. and I.N.S. They
control most of the columnists, more powerful than the editorial pages.
(Westbrook Pegler alone is said to have 10,000,000 circulation.) Their
competition and methods exert a direct influence on rival papers and on
Associated Press, aside from their many memberships in A.P. (one for
each member paper). Their papers dominate circulation in such key areas
as New York, Chicago and Washington.
But there is still more. Decisive is this fact: they form, in effect, a
single political bloc. The power of the bloc begins with its material
foundation, as described above. Here the new factor enters. The
three chains are not just important units in the highly profitable
merchandising enterprise called the newspaper industry. They are active
and conscious political forces. They have a program. They utilize
their papers and personnel for active organization of reactionary
movements and drives. They are not only available to such characters
as Representative Rankin and Senator Bilbo; they not only feature the
hate-speeches of such men: they write the speeches and inspire their
delivery. They instigate fascist activities. Goering and Rosenberg did
not have to seek Hearst out and bribe him to print their Nazi ravings
under their own by-lines: _he sought them out!_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account