The "free press" : $b portrait of a monopolyMarion, George
History
The "free press" : $b portrait of a monopoly
Marion, George
Press -- United States
This was A.P.’s great opportunity, but the agency was fearful of losing
the advantages of cartel membership if it made a bid for South America.
Manager Melville Stone considered that the cartel might oust A.P.
and admit the newer United Press to membership. Accordingly, he left
unanswered a request by _La Nacion_ of Buenos Aires, one of the world’s
leading newspapers, for A.P. service.
New pressures, however, were at work. Within A.P., Kent Cooper, then
only Traffic Manager, learned for the first time of the cartel and of
A.P.’s humiliatingly inferior position in it. He began what he likes
to call his “great crusade,” by which he means a thirty-year fight to
substitute American for British news domination of the world. From
outside the agency came insistent demands by the government for aid in
advancing national policy. The State Department made a crude subsidy
offer with the aim of bribing the South American press. Stone later
wrote:
The State Department asked me to employ the editors of almost
every leading paper in South America on handsome salaries as
correspondents of A.P. ... whether they sent us news or not ... and
the government would recoup us for anything we paid.... They want
something more than a mere news report.... They want some sort of
illuminating service from the United States to indicate that this
country is not money-grabbing or territory-grabbing.
Incidentally, a similar proposal was made for the Far East. A.P.
rejected the proposals. Moreover, “government propaganda” was one
important reason. Moreover, “government propaganda” organizations
were regarded as inadequate and unstable instruments for conquering
news control. A.P. felt the government interest, for one thing, was
not likely to survive the war. Even more important was the fact that
the American news industry has always heavily exploited its alleged
“independence of direct government ties” as proof of its non-partisan
character.
But far from refusing all forms of subsidy, the news industry fought
for and obtained aid in the form of “practical rates for news
transmission; rates attractive enough to encourage the export of
news from the U.S.” The government had for some years encouraged the
laying of new American-owned cables. Now, at the “behest of the State
Department,” the American-owned cable company gave lower rates to
American clients than to Havas, for news to South America. American
news went to South America after all, therefore, on behalf of the State
Department.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account