The "free press" : $b portrait of a monopolyMarion, George
History
The "free press" : $b portrait of a monopoly
Marion, George
Press -- United States
The principal difference, however, is in their publishers. No paper is
published for profit. No multimillionaire can control public opinion.
No people’s organization is without a newspaper: trade unions, hundreds
of them; national groups; local, district and national government
councils; sport groups; youth groups; women’s organizations. They are
crusaders, too; not reactionary anti-vivisection crusaders like the
Hearstlings here, but stinging critics of public and governmental
bodies for sloppy execution of their tasks. And there is a contact
between the readers and the papers that would be inconceivable here.
Newspaper staffs hold regular meetings with readers to discuss
problems raised by the readers and most papers have an annual
readers’ conference at which editors make public accounting of their
stewardship. The Soviet Constitution guarantees printing presses and
stocks of paper to the organizations of the people, such as trade
unions, cultural and scientific organizations, etc. It has not remained
a paper promise: the press is entirely in popular hands. It operates
in a responsible way to further Soviet objectives by stimulating more
active support, by exposing failures.
There is, however, definitely no freedom of the press for
rent-collecting landlords, bankers, industrial monopolists. The Soviet
press is frankly not a formally democratic press but a press of the
working people. That no longer bars any important body of Soviet
citizens, since exploiting classes no longer exist there. The rule
operates primarily to assure an ever-expanding popular participation in
the nation’s political and economic life, while it hampers the work of
hostile foreign intelligence services. This would hardly seem the fit
subject of a diplomatic protest by the British Foreign Office or the
U. S. State Department.
A press of that kind would solve most of the problems of “freedom
of the press” in our country. It can be attained somewhat short of
Socialism, as is occurring in some parts of Eastern Europe. But such a
goal must be recognized as a distant one. Its attainment will require
the utmost effort of the whole American people. A first step is to
spread understanding of the class character and function of the press
as a whole.
What Can We Do?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account